company-name-logo

Laboratory

Latest Judgments

Total 118 Consumer Court Cases Against Laboratory.

Kerala

M/S SUDHARMA LABORATORY AND DIAGONOSTIC SERVICE V/S ABDUL BASHEER

Laboratory  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate AHAMMED KUTTY HAJI PUTHALATH

Respondant Advocate P.S.MURALI

Complaint Case No. 61/20051. ABDUL BASHEER KANHIRATHINGAL,THAMARASSERY,CALICUT. BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENTHONOURABLE MRS. Jayasree Kallat, MA., MemberHONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB., Member PRESENT: ORDERBy Jayasree Kallat, Member; Complaint was ...

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Canara Bank. V/S M/s.Chamundesware Studio and Laboratory (Pvt ltd).

Laboratory  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate C.R. Raghavendra Reddy

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/20001. M/s.Chamundesware Studio and Laboratory (Pvt ltd).No.48/3, Miller Tank Bund Road, Bangalore-52. Repres...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

DIRECTOR, ELECTRONICS REGIONAL TEST LABORATORY (WEST) V/S RELIABLE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, MR.RENU B. KAUSAHL, M.D.

Laboratory  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate VITHAL POL, A.R.

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/10/379 1. RELIABLE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, MR.RENU B. KAUSAHL, M.D.BLDG. NO. 125 & 139, OPP. GAJANAN PETROL ...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 29-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

J F LABORATORY V/S PRAFUL A JOSHI

Laboratory  

Court Name: Jamnagar

Appelant Advocate MILAN PAREKH

Respondant Advocate P M BUCH

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2020

NCDRC

LT. COL. NARASIMHAN GANGAVARAM V/S M/S. SEMI CONDUCTOR LABORATORY

Laboratory  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. BARJESH MITTAL

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 22 Jul 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2660/2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 1953/2008 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. M/S. SEMI CONDUCTOR LABORATORYThrough its Driector, Sector-...

Case Number: 2660

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2010

Telangana

Manager, Transasia Bio-Medicals Pvt. Ltd., V/S Bharath Pathological Laboratory

Laboratory   Transasia  

Court Name: Nizamabad

Appelant Advocate D Venkata Ramana Goud

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2009

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

NCDRC

M/S. SEMICONDUCTOR LABORATORY & ORS. V/S NARASIMHAN GANGAVARAM

Laboratory  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. KAMAKSHI S. MEHLWAL

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 01 Sep 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3283/2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 1953/2008 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. NARASIMHAN GANGAVARAMH.No.4664 MIG I Sector. 70, SAS Nagar....

Case Number: 3283

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2009

Gujarat

SHRI NIRMAL PATHOLOGY LABORATORY AHMEDABAD V/S YOGESH BHAI RAVAL

Laboratory  

Court Name: Surendranagar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2020

Gujarat

Morepen Laboratory V/S Bhavesh Vora

Laboratory  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate P M Pandya

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2007

|

Date of Upload: 21-08-2020

Kerala

Director,Jeena Clinical Laboratory V/S Sreekala Kunjumon

Laboratory  

Court Name: Alappuzha

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

AlappuzhaCONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM ,BAZAR P.Oconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/108 Sreekala Kunjumon ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Director,Jeena Clinical Laboratory ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. JIMMY KORAH 2. K.Anirudhan 3. Smt;Shajitha Beevi Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): ...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Laboratory in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Laboratory ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Laboratory under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.