company-name-logo

KSRTC

Latest Judgments

Total 180 Consumer Court Cases Against KSRTC.

Kerala

KSRTC V/S Priya P

KSRTC  

Court Name: Pathanamthitta

Appelant Advocate Adv P R Raju

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 141

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2023

Karnataka

Mysuru Rural KSRTC Employees HBCS and another V/S H.J.Puttaswamy

KSRTC  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate MCD

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 321

|

Date of Filing: 04-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-09-2022

Karnataka

Case Number: 1433

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2022

Kerala

KSRTC V/S Gokul V

KSRTC  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAMPRESENT SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT SMT.PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER SRI.VIJU.V.R : MEMBERCC.NO.86/2019 (Filed on : 30.03.2019)ORDER DATED : 28.06.2022COMPLAINANT Gokul.V, Gokulam (H) North Pi...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

Kerala

Dr, Jubesh, MBBS, Ms. KSRTC Garage Road Junction, MP XIV 1241, Thalassery Road, Mananthavady V/S Priya C.B, Aged 39 Years, W/o Styjan, Kottanchira, (po) Seethamount, Pulpally

KSRTC  

Court Name: Wayanad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/69/2019( Date of Filing : 28 May 2019 )1. Priya C.B, Aged 39 Years, W/o Styjan, Kottanchira, (po) Seethamount, Pulpally PulpallyWayanadKerala...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 69

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-06-2022

Karnataka

Divisional Controller, KSRTC V/S N. Vijaykumar

KSRTC  

Court Name: Hassan

Appelant Advocate K.R. PRAKASH

Respondant Advocate K B Dayananda

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2020

|

Date of Upload: 13-05-2022

Karnataka

The Depot Manager, KSRTC V/S Karunakara K.

KSRTC  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate I.P(Karunakara)

Respondant Advocate Sai Kiran

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/1736/2014( Date of Filing : 31 Dec 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2014 in Case No. CC/2031/2014 of District Chamrajnagar)1. Karunakara K.Editor, Jai Bhaarath, 99, Main Road,...

Case Number: 1736

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2022

Karnataka

Divisional Controller, KSRTC and another V/S Naveen

KSRTC  

Court Name: Hassan

Appelant Advocate K Nagendra

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-04-2022

Karnataka

Roopa W/o. Shashidhar, Advocate V/S The Divisional Controller, KSRTC

KSRTC  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sai Kiran R.

Respondant Advocate Krishna D. M

08.04.2022.:ORDER:BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER. Case called thrice, none appeared for appellant and appellant also not present. The appellant did not present before this Commission since long time and so-far arguments not addressed by the appellant before this Commission ...

Case Number: 130

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2022

Karnataka

The Senior Divisional Manager ,The New India Assurance Company Limited V/S Divisional Controller KSRTC ,Shivamogga Division

New India Assurance   KSRTC  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate B.A.Gururaja

Respondant Advocate

TUMAKURU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONIndian Red Cross Building ,1st Floor ,No.F-201, F-202, F-238 ,B.H.Road ,Tumakuru.Complaint Case No. CC/50/2021( Date of Filing : 03 Jul 2021 )1. Divisional Controller KSRTC ,Shivamogga Division SUDA Complex ,Vinobhanagara ,S...

Case Number: 50

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2021

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against KSRTC in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against KSRTC ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against KSRTC under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.