Kotak Mahindra
Latest Judgments
Total 2715 Consumer Court Cases Against Kotak Mahindra.
M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD V/S DR SHRI NEERAJ RAMCHANDRA PIMPALKAR
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. 2008/361 1. DR SHRI NEERAJ RAMCHANDRA PIMPALKAR 8/61 UNNAT NGR 3 MG ROAD GOREGAON WEST MUM-62 ...........Appell...
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., V/S Chet Ram
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Harpal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjay Goyal,O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/173 1. Chet RamS/o Sh.Mela Ram s/o Sh.Khiwa Ram, R/o village Bhatwala, Post Office T...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Prime India Ltd V/S Bhavesh Chaganlal Nathvani
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate N S Daftary
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2020
CHETAN KUMAR JAIN & ANR V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JAYDIP BHATTACHARYA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/03/2010 in Appeal No. 62/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.Regd. Office 36-38A, Nariman Bhawan, Nariman PointMumbai - 21Maharasht...
Case Number: 2200
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2010
M/s Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. V/S Ajay Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Ashok Malik
Respondant Advocate Rajneesh Malhotra
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 212 of 2010 1. Ajay SinghS/o Dr. Jaswinder Jit Singh R/o House No. 3511 Sector-37/D Cahndigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Kotak Mahindra Prime...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIM. SURENDRANGAR V/S HARISH CHAMPAKLAL DOSHI
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Surendranagar
Appelant Advocate V. S. JANI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2020
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd V/S PramSangh P. Jadeja
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate S.K.Antani
Respondant Advocate A.M.Parmar
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2020
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. V/S Maltiben Bharatbhai Upadhyaya.
Court Name: Bhavnagar
Appelant Advocate H. R. Upadhayaya
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2020
Kotak Mahindra V/S Raghbir Singh
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate sh S.S Joga
Respondant Advocate
Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumDistt Consumer Forum,MansaCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 191 1. Raghbir SinghRaghbir Singh s/o sh sampuran singh resi of vill jawaharke of m/s ambedkar travels,(regd.),Bus Stand,MansaMansaPunjab ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Kotak Mahindra1. Branch ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Branch Manager, Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd., V/S Mrs. Jyothi Sudhir,
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate P.M. Nayak
Respondant Advocate B.L. Srinantaiah
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/2715/2008 Mrs. Jyothi Sudhir, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Kotal Life InsuranceThe Branch Manager, Kotak Mahindra Prime ...
Case Number: 2715
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.