Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate R V Sakaria
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohit Gadkari & Co.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/5(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2008 in Case No. 281/2007 of District Thane)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTDREG. OFF. 36-38 A, NARIMAN BHAVAN, 227, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MOHIT GADKARI & CO
Respondant Advocate Mr.R.S. Pimpalkar
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/1126(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/07/2010 in Case No. 361/08 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD36-38 A, NARIMAN BHAVAN 227 NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI MUMBAIMA...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Fashion Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S G MAHAMUNI
Respondant Advocate Ashutosh Marathe
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/1261. KUVAM INTRNATIONAL FASHION LTD310 LAXMI SADAN ZAVER ROAD MULUND (W) MUMBAIMUMBAI MAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK MAX L B S ROAD MUL...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Rajkot
Appelant Advocate T N Dhroliya
Respondant Advocate R J Bhatt
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. J & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4299 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/08/2010 in Appeal No. 592/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE9th Floor, Godrej Coliseum, Behind Everard Nagar, Sion (E)Mumbai - ...
Case Number: 4299
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2011
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. HARI HARAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4109 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 13/07/2010 in Appeal No. 2245/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. & ANR.Shop No. 58 and 59, 1st Floor, Shree Complex, Bhavani H.S.G. ...
Case Number: 4109
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2011
Court Name: Alappuzha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/691. Mariamma SebastianH.N. 412, Nagaparambil House,Alappuzha ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Branch Manager, Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.thadikaram Building, Cochin............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE JIMMY KORAH PRESIDENTHONORABLE K.Anirudhan Me...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ish Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjay Goyal,O.P.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/468 1. Rajesh Kumarson of Vijay Kumar, aged about 46 years, R/o opp. Dr.Tirlok Clili...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s JMD Law Asociates
Respondant Advocate Adv A.S.Vidyarthi
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. cc/09/1961. Mrs.Sudha Shyamkumar Shrivastava31,Ashutosh Building,3rd floor,38/A,Napean Sea Road,Mumbai-400 036...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Lif...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.