Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv. K Arunkumar kaimal
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1191. Abdul aseesS/O Muhammedkutty,P.V.House,ChakaramkulamMalapuramKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Prime LtdNaikkanal,Thrissur,Rep By Managing directorThrissurKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Amreli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2015
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3110 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 23/07/2010 in Appeal No. 245/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.UGF-1-11, Upper Ground Floor, Ambadeep Building, 14, Kasturba Gandhi Marg...
Case Number: 3110
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2011
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 23/04/2008 in Complaint No. 70/2003 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MOHD. AZAMR/o.28-145,Azam Rice Mill,Jadcherla,MahaboobNagarAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2011
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 23/04/2008 in Complaint No. 70/2003 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MOHD. AZAMR/o.28-145,Azam Rice Mill,Jadcherla,MahaboobNagarAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2011
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 23/04/2008 in Complaint No. 70/2003 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MOHD. AZAMR/o.28-145,Azam Rice Mill,Jadcherla,MahaboobNagarAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2011
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. D. VARADARAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 23/04/2008 in Complaint No. 70/2003 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MOHD. AZAMR/o.28-145,Azam Rice Mill,Jadcherla,MahaboobNagarAndhra Pradesh...........Appellant...
Case Number: 958
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2011
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Rokade
Respondant Advocate Nagane
1Behind District Treasury Office, Near Central Administrative, Building, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/143 1. Madhukar Jagannath BhosaleKalyan nagar Part-2 Majare wadi SolapurSolapurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd 2. Royal Motors Soharab H...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sanjay Kasture
Respondant Advocate ADV.S.S.ADKAR
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurComplaint Case No. CC/10/355 1. Shri Namdeo Vishwnath KaduNAGPURNAGPURMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.NAGPURNAGPURMAHARASHTRA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. V.N.RANE ,PRESIDENTHONABLE MR. MIL...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.