Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 418 of 2012 1. Komalpreet KaurD/o Sh. Partap Singh Ghotra, 5701/A, Sec 38 West, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Chairman/Managing Director...
Case Number: 418
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2020
Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Unit-I, Kolkatahttp://confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/10/4301. Swarnendu Kumar Adhya81D, Salimpur Road, Kolkata-70031.KolkataWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd. and 2 othersMumbai-400022...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S LAW CELL, MR P G HARTALKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/11/1311. SUDHA SHYAMKUMAR SHRIVASTAVAR/AT 31 ASHOTOSH BUILDING 3RD FLOOR 38/A NEAPEAN SEA ROAD MUMBAI 400036MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S KOTAK MAHI...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Raut
Respondant Advocate None
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/274(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/02/2007 in Case No. cc/06/262 of District Yavatmal)1. Kotak Mahindra BankLimi...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH
Respondant Advocate MR. MANISH TIWARI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1881 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/03/2011 in Appeal No. 137/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.DICSIONAL OFFICE, RESIDECY ROAD,`JOADHPUR...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 3879
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2012
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Mr. R.K.Singla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 372 of 2012 1. Anu Goeld/o Sh. Satish Kumar Goel, r/o H.nO. 756, Sector 9, Panchkula, District Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Kotak Mahindr...
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2012 IN RP/160/20121. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUKHWINDER SINGH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BL...
Case Number: 389
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2012
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAHALING PANDERGE & MR. RAJNISH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 997 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 24/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1583/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK & ORS.Having Registered Office at: 36-38-A, Nariman PointMumbai - 400021M...
Case Number: 997
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2012
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Ahmedabad City
Appelant Advocate D C MEHTA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2020
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.