company-name-logo

Kotak Mahindra

Latest Judgments

Total 2735 Consumer Court Cases Against Kotak Mahindra.

Gujarat

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD V/S HEMSIL RAW PHARMA

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl

Appelant Advocate NILESH V TRIVEDI

Respondant Advocate S.U.SHAH

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 09-01-2020

NCDRC

SUKHWINDER SINGH V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. SETH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 160 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/10/2011 in Appeal No. 54/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.SCO 153-154-155, Madhya Marg, Sector-9Chandigarh...........Petitioner(s)V...

Case Number: 160

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2013

Telangana

The Branch manager, (sales) Kotak Mahindra bank, Khammam V/S Jillepalli Syam Babu

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Khammam

Appelant Advocate Y.Kishore Babu

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 02-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-07-2019

Maharashtra

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Mumbai V/S Vijay Vasantrao Bhadane

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Jalgaon

Appelant Advocate Adv.F.Shaikh

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/08/111. Vijay Vasantrao Bhadane JalgaonMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Mumbai JalgaonMaharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. D.D.MADAKE PRESIDENT PRESENT: ORDERजिल्‍हा ग्राहक त...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. V/S Amba Dass

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 06 of 2013 1. Amba Dass ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 14 Jan 2013 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRI...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

KOTAK MAHINDRA ALL MUTUAL INSU.CO.LTD V/S SHYAM SINGH

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate Prem Jayswal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2016

Punjab

Kotak Mahindra V/S Sandeep Garg

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Vikas Singla

Respondant Advocate

DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/3781. Sandeep Garg...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. Vikramjit Kaur Soni PRESIDE...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

JASPAL KAUR SANDHU & 2 ORS. V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. & ANR.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. FANISH K. JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 738 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/05/2012 in Complaint No. 82/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT MR...

Case Number: 738

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 24-12-2012

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Old Life Insurance Ltd. V/S Smt. Bindu Arora

Life Insurance   Kotak Mahindra   Insurance  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sh. U.K. Agnihotri,Adv.

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 474 of 2012 1. Smt. Bindu Aroraw/o of Sh. V.K.Arora, R/oH.No. 379, Sukhna Enclave, Block-C, Kaimbwala Road, Near Rock Garden, Kansal, U.T., Chandig...

Case Number: 474

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD V/S BALDEV G. DESAI

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate V.M. PANCHOLI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.