company-name-logo

Kotak Mahindra

Latest Judgments

Total 2735 Consumer Court Cases Against Kotak Mahindra.

Maharashtra

M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK V/S MRS. SMITA PRADEEP KARWARKAR

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ADV. PAWAN K. PANDEY & ASSOCIATES.

Respondant Advocate

ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्‍हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd. V/S A P S Rajput

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Kotak Mahindra   Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Anshuman Narula, Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Suri, Adv. for the respondents

First Appeal No. FA/133/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/03/2012 in Case No. CC/760/2011 of District DF-I)1. A P S RajputS/o Sh. B C Rajput, H.No. 730, Sector 11B, Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd.SCO 141-42, Second Floor, Se...

Case Number: 133

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd. V/S B C Rajput

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Kotak Mahindra   Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Anshuman Narula, Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Suri, Adv. for the respondents

First Appeal No. FA/134/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/03/2012 in Case No. CC/761/2011 of District DF-I)1. B C RajputS/o Late Sh. Gurbachan Lal, H.No. 730, Sector 11-B, Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd.SCO 141-42, Second Fl...

Case Number: 134

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra V/S Veena Rajput

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Anshuman Narula, Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Mrigank Sharma, Adv. proxy for Dr. Puneet Kaur Sekhon, Adv. for the r espondents

First Appeal No. FA/227/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Veena RajputW/o Sh. B.C.Rajput R/o House No. 730 Sector-11/B, Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd. SCO 141-142 Second Floor Sector-9/C, Chand...

Case Number: 227

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

KRISHAN KUMAR DHANKAR V/S M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. SANJEEV SINGH AND ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. BHOLA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 874 OF 2012 IN FA/322/20071. M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. KRISHAN KUMAR DHANKAR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, PRESIDING MEMBERH...

Case Number: 874

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 02-04-2013

Maharashtra

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., V/S Shri Sandeep Vasant Shevade

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune

Appelant Advocate S. B. Chandak

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/12/1741. Shri Sandeep Vasant ShevadeFlat No. 20, 3rd Floor, Gajanan Samruti Society, Chainchwad. Old Jakat Naka, Pune 19PuneMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Having Branch at Room No. 801-806, 8th Floor, Soharaba Hall...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

DHIRAJ SETHI & ANR. V/S M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD.

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. PRISTINE COUNCILORS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4162 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/08/2012 in Appeal No. 237/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD.Also Office at: Plot No-4, Unit No-101, DDA Center, First Floor, Di...

Case Number: 4162

|

Date of Filing: 01-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2013

Chandigarh

The Manager, Kotak Mahindra Insurance Company V/S Tarsem lal

Kotak Mahindra   Insurance  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 375 of 2012 1. Tarsem lalTagra R/o 1670 Sector-49/B, Pushpac Complex Chandigarh-160047 ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Manager, Kotak Mahindra Insurance Company SCO 141-142, 2nd Floor, Sector 9/c, Chandigarh.2. Kotak M...

Case Number: 375

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MANU BANSAL, V/S M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. CO. LTD

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. PRISTINE COUNCILORS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4079 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/09/2012 in Appeal No. 334/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. CO. LTDAnd its Office at: Plot No-4, Unit No-101, DDA Center First...

Case Number: 4079

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2013

Chandigarh

Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd, V/S Satish Kumar Goel

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Kotak Mahindra   Insurance   Insurance  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate R.K. Singla

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 445 of 2012 1. Satish Kumar GoelR/o 3 756, Sector 9, Panchkula,Distt. Panchkula. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd,Registered Office 9th Floor, Godrej Coliseum Behind Everard Naga...

Case Number: 445

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.