Court Name: Jodhpur-II
Appelant Advocate RAMNIWAS CHOUDHARY
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDERESSL FORUM JODHPUR 2RAJASTHANComplaint Case No. CC/1293/20121. SHERSINGH CHOUDHARY JODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INS.JODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. TAFFAZUL HUSAIN SAMMA PRESIDENTHON'BLE...
Case Number: 1293
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-06-2015
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Abrol
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.(1) First Appeal No.1062 of 2012 Date of Institution:13.08.2012 Date of Decision: 05.02.2015 Rajinder Kumar son of Sh.Satpal Mahajan R/o ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2015
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Goel, Jatin Kumar, Sourab Bindra and Robin Khanna.
Respondant Advocate
2nd Additional BenchSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJABDAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. 441 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.4.2013 Date of Decision: 5.2.20151. Renu Gupta w/o Sh. Anoop Gupta D/o Sh. Sharan Kumar Gupta through attorney Shar...
Case Number: 441
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2015
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Goel, Jatin Kumar, Sourabh Bindra and Robin Khanna
Respondant Advocate
2nd Additional BenchSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJABDAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. 444 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.4.2013 Date of Decision: 5.2.20151. Renu Gupta w/o Sh. Anoop Gupta D/o Sh. Sharan Kumar Gupta through attorney Shar...
Case Number: 444
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2015
Life Insurance Life Insurance Kotak Mahindra Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Goel, Jatin Kumar, Sourabh Bindra and Robin Khanna
Respondant Advocate
2nd Additional BenchSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJABDAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. 445 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.4.2013 Date of Decision: 5.2.20151. Shally Mittal w/o Sh. Manoj Gupta d/o Sh. Sharan Kumar Gupta through attorney S...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2015
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate K N SHAH
Respondant Advocate GAURAV NANAVATI/N S DAVE
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A. K. Usmani
Respondant Advocate Mr. Anirban Karmakar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/812/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/09/2012 in Case No. CC/150/2011 of District Kolkata-I)1. M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.36-38A, Nariman Bhavan, Nariman Point,...
Case Number: 812
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate S P Raval
Respondant Advocate D K Buch
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2015
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mir Singh
Respondant Advocate N.S. Tanwar
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, REWARIHARYANAExecution Application No. EA/35/2009In1. Surender SinghS/o Karan Singh, R/o 563 BI, Qutubpur, Rewari BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh. Raj Kumar Tewatia PRESIDENT For the Appellant:Sh. Mir Singh, Advocate For the Responden...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/12/467( Date of Filing : 17 Oct 2012 )1. Ranu Dutta108M, Satyendra Nath Mazumder Sarani, Kolkata-700026.KolkataWB..........
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2023
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.