company-name-logo

Kotak Mahindra

Latest Judgments

Total 2735 Consumer Court Cases Against Kotak Mahindra.

Maharashtra

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., 5th floor Usha Complex, Kingsway, Civil Lines, Nagpur. V/S Naim S/o Hamid Khan,A/a 33 years, Occupation: Machanic,R/o Taj Nagar, Near Taj Kirana, Panchsheel Road, Teka, Nagpur-17.

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Kaushik Mandal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/12/7891. Naim S/o Hamid Khan,A/a 33 years, Occupation: Machanic,R/o Taj Nagar, Near Taj Kirana, Panchsheel Road, Teka, Nagpur-17.......

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-01-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Branch manager Kotak Mahindra and 1 other V/S Bharosa Yadav

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Guna

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Branch manager Kotak Mahindra and 1 other V/S Makhan Singh Yadav

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Guna

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 57

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2016

Rajasthan

KOTAK MAHINDRA LIFE INSU. LTD. V/S AJAY BAPNA

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Jaipur-III

Appelant Advocate AMIT SHARMA

Respondant Advocate PRKAESH CAND SHARMA

Case Number: 585

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2015

Circuit Bench Nagpur

RAJU S/O DHANSU FULBEL V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.Y.WADODKAR

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURRevision Petition No. RP/15/60(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/09/2015 in Case No. 171/2014 of District Nagpur)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD274,SHENDRE COMPLEX,CHHAPRU NAGAR,CENTRAL AVENU ROAD,NAGPUR,BRAN...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2015

Chandigarh

M/s Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. V/S Daljit Singh Sandhu

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/400/2014Date of Institution:13/06/2014Date of Decision:05/11/2015Daljit Singh Sandhu resident of House No.138, Sector 35, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1. M/s Kotak Mahindr...

Case Number: 400

|

Date of Filing: 13-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 10-11-2015

Haryana

1. M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.,2. MAGMA FINCORP LTD. V/S SMT. SURESH W/O JASWANT SINGH

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate DAYAL SINGH

Respondant Advocate 1. KAMLESH KHATRI,2. R.S. GARG

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.112 of 2014Instituted on: 29.04.2014 Date of order: 24.11.2015Smt. Suresh widow of Jaswant Singh r/o H.No.147, Ward no.2, Gali no.2, Devi Nagar, Gohana, tehsil Gohana, distt. Sonepat.…Complainant....

Case Number: 112

|

Date of Filing: 29-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 01-12-2015

Kerala

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd V/S Shajeed

Kotak Mahindra Bank   Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Alappuzha

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHAPazhaveedu P.O., AlappuzhaComplaint Case No. CC/315/20141. ShajeedAbdul Nivas,Thuravoor.P.O,Cherthala,Alappuzha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank LtdRept.By its Authorized Signator Branch Manager Sonal Koda...

Case Number: 315

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2015

Madhya Pradesh

branch manager kotak mahindra V/S bharat singh

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: Vidisha

Appelant Advocate manoj singh tomar

Respondant Advocate ram kumar tiwari

Case Number: 107

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 10-12-2015

Gujarat

MUKESH SHAH HELP LINE GRAHAK MANDAL V/S KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INS CO LTD

Kotak Mahindra  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V P NANAVATY

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.