Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Anurag Bagaria, Niladri Banerjee
Respondant Advocate Mr. Abir Das.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/496/2017( Date of Filing : 28 Apr 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/03/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/153/2014 of District Kolkata-I(North))1. Krishnaraj ...
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Balwan Singh Kashyap
Respondant Advocate Gurmeet Singh Khillon
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No. 07 of 2018Date of instt. 08.01.2018Date of decision:11.06.2018Shamsher Singh son of Sh. Ram Kumar resident of House No. 12, Block No, Munak, Tehsil Assandh, Distt. Karnal…………Com...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Madurai
Appelant Advocate M.K.Malaichamy
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 152
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ABDUL KALAM
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 16.05.2018 Date of Decision:18.05.2018Complaint No. 513/2018IN THE MATTER OF:Abdul Kalam, D-225, Abul Fazal Enclave,Jamia Nagar,New Delhi-110025 ….ComplainantV...
Case Number: 513
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Revision Petition No.60/2018(Arising out of the order dated 20.12.2017 passed in Complaint Case No.236/2017 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum(II) New Delhi)Kotak Mahin...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate Ms. Indrani Basu
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/70/2018( Date of Filing : 18 Apr 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/12/2711. Anirvan Banerjee2B, Badan Roy Lane, Sudhama Bu...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Udaipur
Appelant Advocate Bhanwar Singh Rajpurohit
Respondant Advocate Gajendra Nahar
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Firozpur
Appelant Advocate Ashok Kumar Gupta
Respondant Advocate Ranvik Mehta
Case Number: 482
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Debanjan Chatterjee, Mr. A. Adhikary
Respondant Advocate Mr. Sanjit Kr. Acharya.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Revision Petition No. RP/29/2016( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/02/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/114/2015 of District Birbhum)1. Kotak Mahindra ...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2018
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate ARVIND CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:10 of 2018Date of Institution:13.03.2018Date of Decision:24.04.2018Vardhman Jain S/o Sh.Ajit Prasad Jain, House No.214, Sector 10, Panchula, Haryana. ….ComplainantVersus1. Kotak Ma...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.