Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 429 OF 20021. A.K. NAIKWADI, PROP., M/S. ZOOM COLOUR LABM/S. ZOOM COLOUR LAB - KODAK EXPRESS 1216 E WARD RAJARAMPURI JANTA BAZAR KOLHARPUR - 416 008 MAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. KODAK ...
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2002
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate ADV BARADKAR
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/01/709(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/10/2000 in Case No. cc/98/672 of District )1. KODAK INDIA LTD. MUMBAI ..........
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2001
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/10/1881. Kadekkara Sasindran, Chaladan House, Chala ,Edakkad, Kannur Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Kodak Securities, Nirlon House, 4th Floor, Dr. Annie Beasent Road, 400025MumbaiMaharashtra2. The ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 3017
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. V. MOHANA
Respondant Advocate N/A
Date of Filing: 04 Dec 2000 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. No. OP/383/2000 1. M/S. MM COLOUR LABBUSINESS AT 278 7TH STREETGANDHIPURAM COIMBATORE - 641 012 REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR. MUTHI ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/S. KODAK INDIA LTD. &...
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2000
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2010
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 382
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-1994
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kodak in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kodak ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kodak under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.