Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/321(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/11/2003 in Case No. A/03/216 of District Sangli)1. M/S. KIRLOSKAR INVESTMENTS & FINANCE LTDUNIT BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, J.C. ROAD, BANGLORE - 56...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2001
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2017
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Goal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/201 1. KUldeep Goyalson of Tej ram r/o 115-C,Tagore naar, Bathinda. ...........Appel...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate 250/2007
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/317(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/08/2010 in Case No. 250/2007 of District Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban))1. M/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR PVT LTDPLOT NO 1 BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA RAM...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BEKAY LEGAL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/1911. M/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR PVT LTD PLOT NO 1 BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA RAMA NAGAR TALIKA BANGLORE RURAL BANGLORE KARNATAKA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MR DINES...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADITI CHAVAN
Respondant Advocate KAMLESH KHARADE
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/326(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/09/2009 in Case No. 16/2009 of District Mumbai)1. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS LTDPLOT NO 1 BIDADI INSUSTRIAL AREA RAMNAGAR Maharastra...........A...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA
Respondant Advocate MR. PRATHAM KANT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1079 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/02/2007 in Appeal No. 41/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PRIVATE LTD.PLOT. NO. 1BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA RAMANGAR TALUK BANGALORE...
Case Number: 1079
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2011
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Kusum Sood
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALACONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 16 1. Ashok KumarPunjab ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. TOYOTA kirloskar motors pvt ltd.Punjab ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 0...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V. SENTHIL KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 23 OF 20111. SRI MURUGAN RIG SERVICERepresented by its Partner Er.V.Chinnathambi, Son of Varathappa Gounder, Oduvampalayam, Kappandampalayam Post & Village, Tirchengode Taluk,NamakkalTamil Nadu...........C...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2011
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN,Ph:22352624 No:8, 7th floor, Sahakara bhavan, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560052. consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/1647 H.R.Jayasimha ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Managing Director Kirloskar Investments...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kirloskar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kirloskar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kirloskar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.