Kirloskar
Latest Judgments
Total 334 Consumer Court Cases Against Kirloskar.
Toyota Kirloskar Motors Limited V/S Saurabh Aggarwal
Court Name: Moga
Appelant Advocate Sh. Navin Kumar Palta
Respondant Advocate Sh. Kanwar Pahul Singh
THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MOGA. CC No. 142 of 2016 Instituted on: 24.08.2016 Decided on: 28.12.2016Saurabh Aggarwal age 35 years s/o Yudhishthar Aggarwal, r/o Ward no.6, Zira, Now resident of H.No. 30, Green Lane, Backside Geeta Bhawan, Moga, Tehsil and ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2017
Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd and another V/S Sri.H.C.Bharath Raj
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.Kurumbaiah M.B.
Respondant Advocate Sri.SVS
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/582/20151. Sri.H.C.Bharath RajH.C.Bharath Raj, S/o Late H.S.Chikkadevaiah, ...
Case Number: 582
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Kirloskar Electricity Co,LTD V/S Sri.P.Veerabhadrappa
Court Name: Tumkur
Appelant Advocate J.M.Muthurayappa
Respondant Advocate
TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/115/20151. Sri.P.VeerabhadrappaS/o Palaregowda,A/a 53yrs,Agriculturist,R/o Holkurike Village,Honnavalli Hobli,Tiptur TalukTumkurKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2017
HIMMAT SINGH V/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.R.BANSAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No. 113 of 2016Date of Institution: 30.11.2016Date of Decision: 07.12.2016M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office & Works, Plot No.1, Bidadi Industrial Area, Ramanagara Distri...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
TIRATH SINGH OBEROI V/S M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS P LTD & ANR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA
Respondant Advocate MR. PRADEEP GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2944 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 07/05/2008 in Appeal No. 841/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS P LTD & ANRPlot No. 1, Bidadi Industrial Area, Ramnagar TalukBa...
Case Number: 2944
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD V/S U.I.JOHN,MANAGING PARTNER,MARTHOMA GRANITES
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate P.YADHUKUMAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/13/7031. U.I.JOHN,MANAGING PARTNER,MARTHOMA GRANITESEDAVETTY P.O.,THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI-685588...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTDREPRESENTED BY ITS CEO,HEAD OFFICE,PLOT NO.1,BIDADI...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2016
Toyota Kirloskar V/S Ekanath Kacheshwar Dighole
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate G. V. Tadage
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 472
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2016
TOYATA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS PVT.LTD. V/S MANISH NAGPAL
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:43 of 2016Date of Institution:01.08.2016Date of Decision:07.11.2016Manish Nagpal son of Sh.O.P.Nagpal, R/o Flat No.601, Chinar Apartments, Peer Machalla, Tehsil Derabassi, District S.A.S.N...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-11-2016
Amandeep Singh Grewal V/S M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 460
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
1. The Managing Director, Toyota Kirloskar Motors, V/S Smt. Mandava Indiara,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr. Ch. Divakar Babu Secretary, Consumers Guidance Society
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 186
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kirloskar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kirloskar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kirloskar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.