company-name-logo

Kingfisher Airlines

Latest Judgments

Total 114 Consumer Court Cases Against Kingfisher Airlines.

NCDRC

LATA SIKRI V/S KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD.

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KHAITAN & CO. LLP

Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT BHUSHAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 27 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/11/2011 in Appeal No. 293/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD.Kingfisher House, Western Express Highway, Vile Parle (E) Represented ...

Case Number: 27

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2012

Karnataka

The Chief Executive Officer Kingfisher Airlines Ltd V/S Wg.Cd .M.N. Sridhara (Retd)

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/8171. Wg.Cd .M.N. Sridhara (Retd) 18, Sihi, Pawamana Nagara Near B.K. Circle Kothanuru Dinne J.P. Nagar 8th P...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

Suman Bonkurthi, S/o.Gangadher Bonakurthi,H.No.10-18, Vidyanagar Colony, V/S Kingfisher Airlines Limited,Rep.by.its.Chairman and Managing Director, Kingfisher Airlines Limited,

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Vijay Sagi,C-10, DAD Complex, Lekha Nagar, Tirumalgiri,

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/334/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/28/2010 of District Medak)1. Kingfisher Airlines Limited,Rep.by.its.Chairman and Managing Director, Kingfisher Airlines Limited,Kingfisher House, Western Express Highway,Vile Parle...

Case Number: 334

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

BALASANI RAJASEKHAR, S/O LATE RAMASWAMY, V/S 1. KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD., G.S.A. SPENSER'S TRAVEL SERVICES LTD., 2ND FLOOR, ARO BUILDING

Travel   Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S VIJAYA SAGI

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/680/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/03/2011 in Case No. CC/267/2010 of District Visakhapatnam-I)1. 1. KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD., G.S.A. SPENSER'S TRAVEL SERVICES LTD., 2ND FLOOR, ARO BUILDINGPLOT NO.1, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.2. 2. KINGFISHER A...

Case Number: 680

|

Date of Filing: 27-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SANJAY BANGA V/S THE MANAGER, KINGFISHER AIRLINES LIMITED

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MOHAMMAD SHINE K

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/194(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/02/2012 in Case No. 297/2007 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. THE MANAGER, KINGFISHER AIRLINES LIMITED KINGFISHER HOUSE OFF WESTERN EXPRESS HI...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Kingfisher Airlines Ltd V/S P K Sarangi

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. cc/2010/4711. P K SarangiBoat Club Road Pune 01...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kingfisher Airlines LtdBangalore............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT Shri. S. K. Kapase MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERअॅड. विकास कोकाट�...

Case Number: 2010

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

M/s Kingfisher Airlines Ltd, V/S Vikas Jain

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti & Ankur Bali,

Respondant Advocate Y.S.Saini

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 375 of 2010 1. Vikas JainR/o # 87, Shivalik Enclave, NAC, Manimajra, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Kingfisher Airlines Ltd,through i...

Case Number: 375

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/s. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. V/S Ms. Ritika Pahwa

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate Singhania Legal Services

Respondant Advocate kunal cheema

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/1481. Ms. Ritika PahwaB-12, Hyderabad Estate, Nepean Sea Road, Mumbai.Maharastra2. Ms. Gauri GawaskarSamayukta CHS, B-204,...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

KINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD V/S PRADEEP KUMAR JAIN

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/2351. PRADEEP KUMAR JAINSTATE BANK OF INDORE,COMMERCIAL BRANCH,MITTAL COURT,B WING MUM-021...........Complainant(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Kingfisher Airlines and ors V/S V.v.Pathak

Kingfisher Airlines  

Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai

Appelant Advocate Prasad Lotlikar

Respondant Advocate Bharat shah & Co.

Complaint Case No. 9/20081. V.v.PathakmumbaiMumbaiMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kingfisher Airlines and orsmumbaiMumbaiMaharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER PRESENT:Ld.Adv. Mr. Sunil Chatu...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kingfisher Airlines in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kingfisher Airlines ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kingfisher Airlines under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.