company-name-logo

Kanchan

Latest Judgments

Total 750 Consumer Court Cases Against Kanchan.

Madhya Pradesh

M/S KANCHAN TRADERS V/S THE NEW INDIA INSU.CO.

Kanchan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-01-2016

NCDRC

J. S. E. B. & OTHERS V/S KANCHAN DEVI

Kanchan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 102 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/09/2011 in Appeal No. 179/2009 of the State Commission Jharkhand)1. KANCHAN DEVIJagananathdih, MirjaganjGiridihJharkhandja...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. J. S. E...

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 09-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-07-2012

Jharkhand

Masomat Kanchan Devi V/S Dr. Manoj Kumar Bhagat

Kanchan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Chandrajeet Mukherjee

Respondant Advocate M/s S.K. Sharma and A. Shankar

Case Number: 524

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-02-2023

Madhya Pradesh

MXC SOLUTION INDIA LTD. V/S KANCHAN PANDAY

Kanchan  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1231

|

Date of Filing: 27-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2016

West Bengal

Mr. Ram Kanchan Hazra. V/S Dheeraj Promoters (An Associate of poddar Project Ltd)

Poddar   Kanchan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Md. Farhaduddin.

Respondant Advocate Mr. Debdas Rudra.

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2022

Maharashtra

SOU KANCHAN VIJAY PATIL V/S DURGA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS

Kanchan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ABHIJIT ADGULE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/4531. DURGA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERSTHROUGH PROP SHRIRAMCHANDRA SHRIPATRAO PHALKE R/O 1724 D WARD KOLHAPURKOLHAPURMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SAT...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

chairman,Director board Jotirling Garmin Bigasheti Co.-op sahakari patsanstha ltd. V/S Kanchan Vijaykumar deshmukha & other 5.

Kanchan  

Court Name: Solapur

Appelant Advocate Umbarje

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/11/2391. Kanchan Vijaykumar deshmukha & other 5.Brampuri Tal. Mangalwedha SolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. chairman,Director board Jotirling Garmin Bigasheti Co.-op sahakari patsanstha lt...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 07-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

LIC OF INDIA V/S SMT. KANCHAN BAI

Lic   Kanchan  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2015

NCDRC

M/S. GODREJ PHOTO-ME-LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS GODREJ HICARE INDIA LTD.) V/S KANCHAN J. MUSALE

Godrej   Kanchan  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH MAHALE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3125 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/07/2010 in Appeal No. 126/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. KANCHAN J. MUSALEW/o Jayakar Musale, Kanchan Colour Lab, 10/C,Eureka Towers, Traffic IslandHu...

Case Number: 3125

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2012

Gujarat

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Kanchanbhai Ganeshbhai Kanthariya Prop. of Kanchan Textile

United India Insurance   Textile   Insurance   Kanchan  

Court Name: Surat Addl

Appelant Advocate Shreyas Desai

Respondant Advocate Pankaj Shah

Case Number: 334

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2007

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kanchan in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kanchan ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Kanchan under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.