Judge
Latest Judgments
Total 64 Consumer Court Cases Against Judge.
Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital V/S Tanvir Malik
Hospital Institute Dental Judge
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Devender Punia
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/752/2015Date of Institution:06/11/2015Date of Decision:15/12/2016Tanvir Malik S/o Late Lt. Col. Dalbir Singh, R/o H.No. 6319/A, Rajeev Vihar, Modern Housing Complex, Mani Manjra, Cha...
Case Number: 752
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2016
Judge Gas Service & others V/S Gurdev Singh & others
Court Name: Kapurthala
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vikasdeep Singh,Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2016
N.I.C. V/S GULJAR SINGH JUDGE
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/212/20161. GULJAR SINGH JUDGEC/5/100, KESHAV PURAM, LAWRENCE ROAD, NEW DELHI-53............Complainant(s)Versus1. N.I.C.3rd FLOOR 2E/25, JHANDEWALAN, NEW DELHI-110055.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENTHON'B...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2016
Chandigarh Housing Board V/S Jasbir Singh Judge
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 702 OF 2003Jasbir Singh Judge Vs Chandigarh Housing Board & ors.BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Sh.Rajinder ...
Case Number: 702
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2003
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
O.S.Jaiswal,2nd Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), V/S Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Prakashgarh,Bandra (East), Mumbai,Represented By Dy.Executive Engineer, Bramhapuri Sub-Division MSEB
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.C.Khajanchi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/03/600(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/02/2003 in Case No. cc/140/2001 of District Chandrapur)1. Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Prakashgarh,Bandra (East), Mumbai,Represented By...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2003
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2016
Chandigarh Housing Board V/S Jasbir Singh Judge
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Rajinder Ghai
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Miscellaneous Application NO. 21 OF 2016in CC/702/2003Jasbir Singh Judge Vs Chandigarh Housing Board & ors.BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Rajinder G...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Station Manager, W.B.S.E.B. (WBSEDCL), Judge Bazar V/S Hazi Marium Bibi, Rep. by her Grandson Aftab Hossain
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sankar Mukhopadhyaya
Respondant Advocate Mr.Srijan Nayek.,Mr. Alok Mukhopadhyay.
...
Case Number: 1287
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2016
ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd V/S Arun Judge
Icici Prudential Life Insurance Life Insurance Judge
Court Name: Dehradun
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd., and Another V/S Sadashiv S/o Abbaiah, aged about 48 years, Occ Superintendent, O/o Senior Civil Judge Court at Nizamabad
Court Name: Nizamabad
Appelant Advocate A.Sangameshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate
causetitlejudgement entryExecution Application No. EA/5/2015InCC/05/631. Sadashiv S/o Abbaiah, aged about 48 years, Occ Superintendent, O/o Senior Civil Judge Court at Nizamabad7-12-1131/1, Ashoknagar, NizamabadTelangana...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd., ...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2015
THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE V/S SHRI.MAROTRAO GOMAJI CHAUDHARY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 15-04-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Judge in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Judge ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Judge under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.