Judge
Latest Judgments
Total 64 Consumer Court Cases Against Judge.
Judge Gas Service V/S Jaswant Singh
Court Name: Kapurthala
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vikasdeep Singh Nandha,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2018
Judge Gas Service V/S Amrik Singh
Court Name: Kapurthala
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vikasdeep Singh Nandha,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2018
Judge Gas Service V/S Consumer Rights & Public Protection
Court Name: Kapurthala
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vikasdeep Singh,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
The M.D. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. V/S Ravinder Singh Judge
India Bulls Finance Finance Judge
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arnav Sood
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. Consumer Complaint No.35 of 2016 Date of Institution : 03.02.2016 Order Reserved on : 12.12.2017 Date of De...
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2017
Gizmohelp.com V/S Sanjay Judge
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Pandey
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/08/2017Date of Institution:03/01/2017Date of Decision:28/11/2017Sanjay Judge, House No.813, Sector 43-A, Chandigarh.……… Complainant.Versus1) Gizmohelp.com, Corpo...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2018
Chairman cum Managing Director, The UCO Bank & 9 others. V/S The Tripura Retired Judge Association.
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate Mr.K.deb, Mr.S.Paul.
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.L.Saha, Mr.K.Nandi.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSSAL FORUM WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALACASE NO: CC- 60 of 2017The Tripura Retired Judges' Association, Represented by Sri Dilip Kumar Daschaudhuri, Being its Secretary having its Registered Office at Krishnanagar, Nutan Palli, Agartala, West Tripu...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2017
Tanvir Malik V/S Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/102/2017(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/04/2017 in Case No. CC/752/2015 of District DF-I)1. Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge InstituteChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Tanvir MalikChandigarh...........Respo...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2017
Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital V/S Tanvir Malik
Hospital Institute Dental Judge
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devender Punia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Prof. Divinder Singh
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/22/2017(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/12/2016 in Case No. CC/752/2015 of District DF-I)1. Tanvir MalikMani Majra, Chandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Scie...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2017
Judge Battery Hosue V/S Sukhbir Singh
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janakpuri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution:27.10.2014Complaint Case No.703/14 Date of order:15.02.2017IN MATTER OFShri Sukhbir Singh, G-25, B LIG Flat, Tilak Nagar...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2017
Gizmohelp.com V/S Sanjay Judge
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Pandey Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :29/12/2016ORDER Sh. Rajinder Pandey, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraw this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant woul...
Case Number: 1053
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Judge in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Judge ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Judge under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.