company-name-logo

Judge

Latest Judgments

Total 64 Consumer Court Cases Against Judge.

Uttar Pradesh

SBI V/S Mahendra Kumar Ashulipic Apar Jila Judge

Sbi   Sbi   Judge  

Court Name: Firozabad

Appelant Advocate Sri Sharshad Ali Khan Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 118

|

Date of Filing: 13-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2022

Madhya Pradesh

District And Session Judge And Others V/S Mahendra Nath Bajpai

Judge  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate Mahendra Nath Bajpai

Respondant Advocate S.N. Verma

Case Number: 165

|

Date of Filing: 23-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2021

Chandigarh

The Managing Director, Carlton Sports India. V/S Sanjay Judge

Sports   Judge  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Rajinder Pandey

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 414 OF 2020Sanjay Judge Vs The Managing Director, Carlton Sports India & ors. BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Rajinde...

Case Number: 414

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 08-01-2021

Kerala

The Branch Manager V/S Mag daline Judge Rozario

Judge  

Court Name: Trissur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/12/496( Date of Filing : 20 Oct 2012 )1. Mag daline Judge Rozario19/1927 Bishop Palace Road,East FortThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Branch ManagerM/sOriental Insurance Co.Ltd Br.Office...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 20-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 16-01-2021

Punjab

HDFC Bank, HDFC ERGO V/S Daljit Singh Judge

Hdfc   Judge  

Court Name: Hoshiarpur

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate Sh. YP Piplani

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOSHIARPUR.DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX ROOM NO. 323 3RD FLOOR.PHONE NO. 01882-221522.Complaint Case No. CC/18/126( Date of Filing : 23 Aug 2018 )1. Daljit Singh Judges/o Sh. Mangal Singh r/o VPO Sahri, Teh. & Distt. Hoshiarpur....

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2020

Uttar Pradesh

Additional Civil Judge V/S Sobaran Singh

Judge  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1139/2019( Date of Filing : 23 Sep 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/09/2019 in Case No. M/24/2019 of District Kanpur Dehat)1. Sobaran SinghS/O ...

Case Number: 1139

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2019

Madhya Pradesh

MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA V/S DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE

Mahindra & Mahindra   Judge  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2019

Delhi

SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE NO. IV V/S SHRI JAI GUPTA

Judge  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/579/2012( Date of Filing : 02 Nov 2012 )1. SHRI JAI GUPTA15-C MIG DDA FLATS SEIKH SARAI PHASE-I NEW DELHI 110017...........Complainant(s)V...

Case Number: 579

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2019

Madhya Pradesh

DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE V/S SITARAM

Judge  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH. S.R. SONI

Respondant Advocate SH. LALIT GUPTA

8.4.2019. None for the appellant. Shri Lalit Gupta, learned counsel for respondent. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (Justice Shantanu Kemkar) (Dr. Monika Malik) President Member...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-04-2019

Maharashtra

THE HON'BLE JUDGE V/S MR.ALTAF A.PIRANI

Judge  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 07-01-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Judge in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Judge ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Judge under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.