Jindal
Latest Judgments
Total 1157 Consumer Court Cases Against Jindal.
PACL India Limited V/S Munish Jindal
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Sohan Lal Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/368/20151. Munish JindalMunish Jindal S/o Vinod Kumar, R/o C/o Bikkar Mal backside Gaushala, Mansa District MansaMansaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PACL India Limited1.PACL India Limited, Branch Office (Customer service Centre) SCF ...
Case Number: 368
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2016
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Secretary to Govt. of Punjab V/S Veena Jindal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Padamkant Dwivedi
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1057
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2016
The PACL Ltd V/S Ravinder Jindal
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABExecution Application No. EA/16/13InComplaint Case No. CC/14/7001. Ravinder Jindal son of Pirthi chand Ambika sanitary store, Bibi wala road, Bathinda...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
Karbonn Mobiles V/S Atam Swarup Jindal
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 759 Instituted on: 29.07.2015 Decided on: 02.03.2016Atam Swarup Jindal son of Shri Hem Raj Jindal, resident of 98, Rose Avenue, Malerkotla 148 023 District Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. Karbon Mobiles thro...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2016
PRADEEP KUMAR JINDAL V/S UNIT TRUST OF INDIA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision : 29.02.2016 Date of arguments heard : 05.02.2016First Appeal No.403/08(Arising out of the order dated 11.12.07 passed in Complaint Case No.538/...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
PACL Limited V/S Isham Jindal
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/64/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/92/20151. Isham JindalIsham Jindal S/o Vikash Kumar S/o Bhim Sain R/o Backside Pharwahi Bazar Barnala Tehsil and District Barnala now at custody this father through Vikash Kumar S/o Bhim Sain R/o Backside...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2016
Town Improvement trust V/S shivani jindal
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Lalit Garg
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/6181. shivani jindald/o sohan Lal Jindal r/o House No446, Kamla Nehru colony, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Town ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2016
Jindal pathology laboratory Through its Owner V/S Ajay Pandurang Devkar
Court Name: Aurangabad
Appelant Advocate Adv k A Bankar
Respondant Advocate Adv
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2016
RAVINDRA KUMAR, M.D. Of JINDAL TOWER Co. V/S SRI RAJENDRA NATH DAS.
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate Amit Pachal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Execution Application No. EA/14/125InComplaint Case No. CC/13/3131. SRI RAJENDRA NATH DAS.S/O- Late Dular Chandra Das, 11/1/1, ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jindal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jindal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Jindal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.