Jindal
Latest Judgments
Total 1149 Consumer Court Cases Against Jindal.
Jindal pathology laboratory Through its Owner V/S Ajay Pandurang Devkar
Court Name: Aurangabad
Appelant Advocate Adv k A Bankar
Respondant Advocate Adv
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2016
RAVINDRA KUMAR, M.D. Of JINDAL TOWER Co. V/S SRI RAJENDRA NATH DAS.
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate Amit Pachal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Execution Application No. EA/14/125InComplaint Case No. CC/13/3131. SRI RAJENDRA NATH DAS.S/O- Late Dular Chandra Das, 11/1/1, ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
Micromax Informatics Ltd V/S Tejinder Kumar Jindal
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Garg
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/74/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/316/20151. Tejinder Kumar JindalTejinder Kumar Jindal aged about 37 years S/o Ashok Kumar R/o Inderlok Avenue, Dhanaula Road Barnala Tehsil and District BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
PACL India Ltd V/S Jagdish Jindal
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Dhiraj Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/382/20151. Jagdish JindalJagdish Jindal aged about 37 years S/o Tarsem Lal Jindal R/o Kothi No. 306, Astha Enclave Barnala Tehsil and District BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PACL India Ltd1.P.A.C.L. India Ltd. (Pearls),...
Case Number: 382
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
PACL India Ltd V/S Jagdish Jindal
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Dhiraj Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/383/20151. Jagdish JindalJagdish Jindal aged about 37 years S/o tarsem Lal Jindal R/o Kothi No. 306, Astha Enclave Barnala Tehsil and District BarnalaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PACL India Ltd1.P.A.C.L. India Ltd. (Pearls),...
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
DARJEELING AUTOMOBILE (P) LID. V/S SRI PANKAJ JINDAL
Court Name: Siliguri
Appelant Advocate PAYEL NANDI
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, SiliguriKshudiram Basu Bipanan Kendra (2nd Floor)H. C. Road, P.O. and P.S. Prodhan Nagar,Dist. Darjeeling.Complaint Case No. CC/15/601. SRI PANKAJ JINDAL2125A.P.C. SARANI, DESHBANDHUPARA,SILIGURI-734003............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 20-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2016
Lokesh Kumar Sharma S/o Sh. Ramswaroop Sharma V/S Jindal Industries Ltd. Through G.M.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Jain
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1052
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2016
Lifestyle International Pvt. Ltd. V/S Hitesh Jindal
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Nikunj Dhawan
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/490/2015Date of Institution:31/07/2015Date of Decision:18/01/2016Hitesh Jindal, resident of House No.1441-A, Sector 39-B, Chandigarh.…............ Complainant.VsLifestyle Inte...
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2016
Royal Sundram Alliance Ins co. V/S Kuldeep Jindal
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate M.K. Dhamija
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/3491. Kuldeep Jindalson of Dev Raj Jindal r/o H.No.136, Mohan nagar ward no12 Gidderbaha tehsil Gidderbaha district Mukatsar ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2016
Raj Kumar Jindal V/S Sangrur Improvement Trust
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S. Modi
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1300
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jindal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jindal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Jindal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.