Jindal
Latest Judgments
Total 1157 Consumer Court Cases Against Jindal.
PACL India Ltd V/S Mantosh Jindal
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Amit Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/2187/20151. Mantosh JindalS/o late Varinder Kumar R/o Ward No.8, HandiayaBarnalaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PACL India Ltd1.PACL India Ltd (Pearls) Corporate Office 7th floor Gopaldas Bhawan, 28 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110001 t...
Case Number: 2187
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2016
Hisar Hyundai V/S Nitin Jindal
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate Gourav Beniwal
Respondant Advocate Puneet Garg, Sandeep Garg
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2016
Balaji Telecom V/S Narinder jindal
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/16/1191. Narinder jindalgali no.5/3 D Baba farid nagar Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Balaji Telecom samsung service ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2016
M/s. Parsvanath Developers Limited & Others V/S Raj Kumar Jindal son of late Shri Ganga Sharan Jindal
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 446
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2016
Bharti Airtel V/S Viky Jindal
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh Parvinder singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/15/2281. Viky Jindals/o Satj paul Jindal r/o H.No.78 Sewak colony PatialapatialaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bharti AirtelRegid office at Aravali Crescent 1 Nelson Mandela road Vasant Kunja ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2016
FCI DEPPT. & 3 ORS. V/S SHAM LAL JINDAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANUPAM GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJEEV SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1571 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/09/2013 in Appeal No. 926/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. SHAM LAL JINDALS/O SH.RAM PRAKASH R.O SANT RAM ADVOCATE STREET,MANSA- 151505PUNJAB...........Pet...
Case Number: 1571
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Mobile Matrix V/S Amit Jindal
Court Name: Jind
Appelant Advocate Sh Ashwani Jindal
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/15/121. Amit JindalR/O Indra Bazar, JindJindHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mobile MatrixMobile Matrix, Bal Bhawan Shop No. 7, Gohana Road, JindJindHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dina Nath Arora PRESIDENTH...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
Varinder Kumar Jindal V/S M/s Trackon Courier Private Limited
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon Jindal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma & Hoshiar Singh
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.784 of 2013 Date of Institution: 22.07.2013 Date of Decision: 17.05.2016Trackon Courier private limited, Zinda Kunji Mo...
Case Number: 784
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2016
Punjab urban planning and Development Authority V/S Prem Jindal
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh. SK Singla
Respondant Advocate Sh N K Sharma
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
Tata Motors Finance Ltd V/S Naresh Kumar Jindal S/o Gopi Ram
Tata Motors Tata Motors Finance Tata Motors Finance Tata Jindal
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate R.K. Kamra
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.60 of 2011 Date of instt.: 27.01.2011 Date of decision: 11.05.2016Naresh Kumar Jindal son of Shri Gopi Ram, resident of House no.2051, Old Market, Ismailabad, District Kurukshetra.. ……..Co...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jindal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jindal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Jindal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.