company-name-logo

Jindal

Latest Judgments

Total 1157 Consumer Court Cases Against Jindal.

Uttar Pradesh

M/S JINDAL PHOTO FILMS V/S DEEPA AHUJA

Jindal  

Court Name: Muradabad-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 11-03-1999

|

Date of Upload: 24-06-2015

Chandigarh

Pepsico India V/S Dinesh Jindal

Pepsico   Jindal  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Suri

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/614/2014Date of Institution:12/09/2014Date of Decision:16/06/2015Dinesh Jindal s/o Sh. Raj Kumar Jindal, #4735, Sector 70, Mohali, Punjab.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1. PepsiCo Indi...

Case Number: 614

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 24-06-2015

Chandigarh

Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Limited V/S Satish Jindal

Health Insurance   Health Insurance   Jindal  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:437 of 2014Date of Institution:26.08.2014Date of Decision:05.06.2015Satish Jindal son of Sh.Ram Kumar Jindal, r/o H.No.1047, Sector 38-B, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersus1] Apollo Mu...

Case Number: 437

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2015

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Ramraje Annsaheb Patil V/S Jindal Seeds

Seeds   Jindal  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adv.D S Tipole

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2015

Chandigarh

Hewlett-Packard India Ltd. V/S Visham Jindal

Jindal  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Parambir Singh

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/661/2014Date of Institution:18.12.2014Date of Decision:29.05.2015Vishwam Jindal son of Sh.Puneet Jindal through attorney Mrs.Beenu Jindal w/o Puneet Jindal r/o House No.1241, Sector...

Case Number: 661

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-06-2015

Punjab

N.Kumar Electronics V/S Hamesh Jindal

Jindal  

Court Name: Ludhiana

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Hanush Jindal Vs M/s N.K.Kumar Electronics (EA/200/28/10/2014)29.5.15Present: Sh.Munish Mittal, Advocate for applicant. Respondent no.1 and 2 exparte. Sh.Gurjeet Singh, Proprietor of M/s Dhir Electronics/respondent no.2A. Sh.Gurjeet Singh, Proprietor of M/s Dhir Electronics/res...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 28-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-06-2015

Punjab

PNB Bank V/S M/S Jindal Tyres

Jindal  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. SK Singla

Respondant Advocate Sh. Manoj Singla

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 30-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 01-06-2015

Haryana

Dr. Rajinder Parsad Jindal V/S Smt. Saroj

Jindal  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. M.S.Gulia

Respondant Advocate Sh. R.S.Saini

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2015

Punjab

Dr. Simpy Jindal V/S Suman Devi

Jindal  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri Rajan Kapil

Respondant Advocate Shri Parul Chawla

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 512 Instituted on: 02.09.2014 Decided on: 18.05.20151. Suman Devi wife of Rajesh Kumar, aged 30 years.2. Rajesh Kumar son of Shri Rattan Singh, residents of Village Kular Khurd, Tehsil and District Sangrur. ..Comp...

Case Number: 512

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2015

Punjab

Mukesh Kumar Jindal V/S Kohli Auto Co.(S) Kacs Complex

Jindal  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gulzar Mohd.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-06-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jindal in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jindal ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Jindal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.