company-name-logo

Jewelers

Latest Judgments

Total 92 Consumer Court Cases Against Jewelers.

Maharashtra

The3 vira Marchant Co.OP.Bank Ltd. V/S Laxmi Narayan jewelers prop. vijaysniha vishnupant Chavan

Jewelers  

Court Name: Solapur

Appelant Advocate gavai

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/11/3651. Laxmi Narayan jewelers prop. vijaysniha vishnupant ChavanMuncipal Shoping centre Sangola Tal Sangola solapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The3 vira Marchant Co.OP.Bank Ltd.Branch San...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

GITANJALI JEWELERS V/S RAJESH DIXIT

Jewelers  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 189

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2016

Delhi

RANGILA JEWELERS V/S G.S. BHATIA

Jewelers  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 238/13Shri G.S. BhatiaS/o Shri Gurcharan Singh BhatiaR/o B-2, S-1, Chander nagarSahibabad, Ghaziabad, UP ….Complai...

Case Number: 238

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2018

Madhya Pradesh

SANJAY SAHU V/S M/S GUPTA JEWELERS

Jewelers  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2020

NCDRC

M/S. PANCHSHEEL JEWELERS V/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

Jewelers   New India Assurance  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRAMOD DAYAL & MR. NIKUNJ DAYAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2833 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/03/2012 in Appeal No. 2448/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.Having Office at 87, M.G Road FORTMumbaiMaharastra...........Pe...

Case Number: 2833

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-12-2012

Madhya Pradesh

SAKAR JEWELERS V/S LUCKY JAIN

Jewelers  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 902

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-04-2016

Chandigarh

Sant Ram mangat Ram Jewelers V/S Jagjit Singh

Jewelers  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 252 of 2012 1. Jagjit SinghR/o House No. 415 Type-III GGSSTP Nuhon Colony PO Ghanauli Tehgsil and Distt. Ropar ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Sant Ram mangat Ram JewelersJewelers SCO NO. 40 Sector-17 Chandigarh .............

Case Number: 252

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

SHRI YAMUNA JEWELERS V/S RAMESHBHAI MANSUKHBHAI VAGHELA

Jewelers  

Court Name: Navsari

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 01-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2019

Maharashtra

M/s. Panchshreel Jewelers V/S The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,

The New India Assurance   Jewelers   New India Assurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R. Bhargavan & Associates - Mr. Yadunath Bhargavan

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/2448(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. First Appeal No. of District Mumbai)1. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,Through its Sr. Divisional Manager, Mr.S. K. Raut, Hav...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 18-11-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

AGRAWAL JEWELERS V/S PRAKASHBHAI KANUBHAI SHAH

Jewelers  

Court Name: Ahmedabad City

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate SELF

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jewelers in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jewelers ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Jewelers under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.