Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE DELHI STATECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 28.07.2017 Date of Decision : 08.08.2017 Complaint No. 1094/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Mrs. Kanta Tyagi,C-279, Gagan Vihar,Behind Tulsi ...
Case Number: 1093
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE DELHI STATECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 28.07.2017 Date of Decision : 08.08.2017 Complaint No. 1094/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Mrs. Kanta Tyagi,C-279, Gagan Vihar,Behind Tulsi ...
Case Number: 1094
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2017
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Gunjan Sharma
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/515/2013( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2013 )1. Raghuraj Sharan GoelNew Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Jaypee Infratech Ltd.Gautam Buddh Nagar............Opp.Pa...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2021
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Hardip singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No.690 of 19.09.2016Date of Decision : 02.06.2017Nimit Jain son of Sh.Rakesh Kumar Jain r/o House No.1310, Old Court Road, Ward No.22, Rajindra Nagar, Civil Lines Tech, Part-I, Ludhiana.….. Complainant...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Hardip singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No.691 of 19.09.2016Date of Decision : 02.06.2017Nitin Jain son of Sh.Rakesh Kumar Jain r/o House No.1310, Old Court Road, Ward No.22, Rajindra Nagar, Civil Lines Tech, Part-I, Ludhiana.….. Complainant...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate J.S.Virk Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No. : 226 of 01.04.2015 Date of Decision : 10.05.2017Prem Kumar Gupta aged 65 years son of Shri Jagdish Chand Gupta, resident of 190-E, Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana, at present resident of 502-F, Shaheed Bhagat Si...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vibhor Bagga
Respondant Advocate Issar Husain R. K. Misra
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/18/20151. Rajan NandaR/O flate No. B.104 JaKJA aOARTNEBT sECTIR 6oKOT nO. 31 dWARKA New Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Jaypee Sports In...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 799 OF 20171. AARTI SURID-68,DEFENCE COLONYNEW DELHI-110024...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD. & 9 ORS.THROUGH:EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN AND CEO JA HOUSE,63 BASANT LOK,VASANT VIHARNEW DELHI-11...
Case Number: 799
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PIYUSH SINGHAL
Respondant Advocate
N THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 11.11.16 Date of Decision: 15.11.16Complaint No. 1293/2016In the matter of: PRIYANKA BHATLA W/o Mr. Mumuksh Koul R/o 1042, H 3 Block SBI Encl., Bodella Vikaspur...
Case Number: 1293
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/16/7611. A.K. GanesanS-3 910,Brindavan,11th Main,AGB Layout Bangalore 560090...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director Jaypee Infratech LtdSector...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jaypee in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jaypee ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Jaypee under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.