Jaypee Infratech
Latest Judgments
Total 85 Consumer Court Cases Against Jaypee Infratech.
M/s Jaypee Infratech Ltd. V/S Smt.Manjula
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Brijpal Singh
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/260/2017( Date of Filing : 04 May 2017 )1. Smt.Manjula 19,Civil Lines.MuradabadUttar Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Jaypee Infratech Ltd.Sec-128,Noida.Ga...
Case Number: 260
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2018
M/s Jaypee Infratech Ltd. V/S Manish Kumar
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Brijpal Singh
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/259/2017( Date of Filing : 04 May 2017 )1. Manish Kumar27E/24B,Chakiratul,GTB Nagar.AllahanadUttar Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Jaypee Infratech Ltd.Se...
Case Number: 259
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2018
M/S. Jaypee Infratech Ltd. V/S Vijay Saini
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC-473/2013 Dated: 07/06/2018 O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs i.e. Rs.46,58,700/- as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Juris...
Case Number: 473
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2018
M/S Jaypee Infratech Ltd V/S Smt. Richa Agarwal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Subham Tripathi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/164/2018( Date of Filing : 03 May 2018 )1. Smt. Richa AgarwalNew Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Jaypee Infratech LtdNoida.............
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2018
M/S. JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD. & ANR. V/S RAJNISH BHASIN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SIDHARTH TYAGI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1980 OF 20171. RAJNISH BHASINS/o Mr. Jagmohan Bhasin, R/o. A-706, Sector-19,Noida Uttar Pradesh 01...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD. & ANR.Through its Managing Director, Regd. Off...
Case Number: 1980
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2018
M/S. JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD. & ANR. V/S DEVESH AAGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SIDHARTH TYAGI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1979 OF 20171. DEVESH AAGARWALR/O H NO-178,SECTOR-14, GURUGRAMHARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR OR AUTHORISED PERSON, SECTOR-128, NOIDA...
Case Number: 1979
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2018
M/s JAYPEE Infratech Ltd. V/S SMC Globle Securities Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Puran Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2018
Chairman cum Managing Director Jaypee Infratech Ltd. V/S Smt. Sanju Singh
Court Name: Dhanbad
Appelant Advocate Shashidhar Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2020
1. M/s. Jaypee Infratech Ltd., V/S 1. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Vishwakarma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. A/127/2017(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/02/2017 in Case No. CC/516/2016 of District Hyderabad-II)1. 1. Dr. Rajesh Kumar VishwakarmaS/o Lt.Col Dr. Vishwakarma, 407, D.V. Apartments, Salarjung Colony, Kakatiya Nagar, ...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2017
JAYPEE INFRATECH LTD. V/S MADHURI SHARMA
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jaypee Infratech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jaypee Infratech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Jaypee Infratech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.