company-name-logo

Jaipur Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 64 Consumer Court Cases Against Jaipur Development Authority.

Rajasthan

COMMISSIONER JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JAIPUR V/S RAJIV CHATURVEDI

Jaipur Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 22

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2024

|

Date of Upload: 14-10-2024

NCDRC

RAJESH VERMA & ANR. V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Jaipur Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHIV MANGAL SHARMA

Respondant Advocate M/S. NAGPAL & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 01/05/2015 in Complaint No. 53/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER, JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU MARG, JAIPURRAJASTHAN .....

Case Number: 619

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 20-09-2024

NCDRC

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DAULAT SINGH HALDEA & 3 ORS.

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. EPA LAW OFFICEES

Respondant Advocate RESPONDENT EX PARTE VIDE ORDER DATED 16/10/2023

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 04/05/2022 in Complaint No. 45/2019 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. DAULAT SINGH HALDEA & 3 ORS.FLAT NO. 401, S-52, ARVIND MARG, C-SCHEME, JAIPUR2. ASHA HALDEA FLAT ...

Case Number: 377

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 30-04-2024

Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority V/S Rajkumar Jain

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Shakeel Khan

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 202

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2024

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2024

NCDRC

RAJEEV CHATURVEDI V/S COMMISSIONER, JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR & MS. HARSHA VINOY

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ KHANNA, MR. MUKESH KUMAR SINGH & MS. ANEET BAGGA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 199 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 27/09/2018 in Complaint No. 37/2017 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. COMMISSIONER, JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.RAMKISHORE VYAS BHAWAN INDIRA CIRCLE, JAWAHAR LA...

Case Number: 199

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2024

NCDRC

SITARAM SHARMA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR & MS. HARSHA VINOY

Respondant Advocate MR. VIJAY KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2366 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 16/09/2016 in Appeal No. 1088/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH SECRETARY, JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU MARG, JAIPURRAJASTHAN.........

Case Number: 2366

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-07-2023

Rajasthan

Jaipur Development authority V/S Aaditya Jain

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Mahendra Singh Hameradya

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 219

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Rajasthan

Jaipur Development authority V/S Aaditya jain

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Sanjay Rahad

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority V/S Dr. Daulat Singh Haldea

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dileep Shivpuri

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2022

Rajasthan

Jaipur Development Authority V/S Rajesh Chaudhary S/o Gopi Ram Jat

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Pramod Kumar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 196

|

Date of Filing: 09-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jaipur Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jaipur Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Jaipur Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.