Internet
Latest Judgments
Total 1606 Consumer Court Cases Against Internet.
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2022
Flipkart internet pvt.Ltd V/S Rahul Nanji Sawla
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICT.Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd floor, Gen. Nagesh Marg, Nr. Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12.Complaint Case No. CC/13/861. Rahul Nanji Sawla312, Ranvir Sadan,Dr.B. Ambedkar Road, lalbaug Mumbai-400 012...........Complaina...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s. Hathway Internet # 301, 301A, S.V.E. Meera Mansion, Civil Supplies Bhavan Lane, Somajiguda, Hyd V/S Smt. Vuppu Sailasree W/o. Sreekanth Aged about 40 Years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o. 3-1-92/163 Rock Town L.B. Nagar.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smt. Vuppu Sailasree
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 568 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/05/2013 in Case No. CC/76/2013 of District Rangareddi)1. Smt. Vuppu Sailasree W/o. Sreekanth Aged about 40 Years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o. 3-1-92/163 Rock Town L.B. Nagar............Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s. Hathway Internet # 3...
Case Number: 568
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
TATA COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET SERVICES LTD V/S SHRI. SAKHARAM NAGESH MARATHE
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2241. SHRI. SAKHARAM NAGESH MARATHEB/3 AASARA GULMOHAR ROAD,CHUNABHATTI SIONMUMBAI-400022MAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TATA COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET SERVICES LTDVIDESH SANCHAR BHAVAN,MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD,FORTMUMBAI-400001MAHARASHTRA.............
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Tata Communication Internet Services Limited V/S T.A. Subrahmanyam
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
MANAGER SHREE (BROAD BAND INTERNET DIPARTMENT ) B.S.N.L. OFFICE SURENDRANAGAR V/S NAVINCHANDRA HIMATLAL SHAH
Court Name: Surendranagar
Appelant Advocate V. H. SHETH
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2021
Case Number: 267
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2016
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. & ANR. V/S M/S. S.G. INTERNET SERVICES
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNNY CHOUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MOHAN LAW CO.,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3955 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/03/2011 in Appeal No. 1850/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. S.G. INTERNET SERVICESthrough its Partner,Presently R/o at : -H.No-188, Sector-11-D,Poloc...
Case Number: 3955
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2013
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. & ANR. V/S M/S. S.G. INTERNET SERVICES
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNNY CHOUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MOHAN LAW CO.,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 729 OF 2012 IN RP/3955/20111. M/S. S.G. INTERNET SERVICES...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN, PRES...
Case Number: 729
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2012
M/s Zimes internet ltd V/S Rohidaas Naika
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/107/2012( Date of Filing : 21 Mar 2012 )1. Rohidaas NaikaKavoor Mangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Zimes internet ltdGurgaon Haryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: ...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Internet in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Internet ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Internet under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.