company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

Haryana

The Central Soil Salinity Research Institute V/S M/s Sainik Surveillance & Security Services Private Limited

Institute  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate J.P. Duhan

Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 549 of 2020 Date of instt.02.12.2020 Date of Decision:12.08.2022M/s Sainik Surveillance & Security Services Pvt. Ltd. plot no.1100 (P) Sector 46, Gurgaon-122003, through its proprietor Jasvir S...

Case Number: 549

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2022

Bihar

Taj Online india Pvt. ltd. V/S A.B. Eye Institute

Institute  

Court Name: Patna

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMPATNA, BIHARComplaint Case No. CC/436/2018( Date of Filing : 27 Sep 2018 )1. A.B. Eye Institute Prem Chand Marg Near Bahadur Pur Gumti, Rajendra Nagar, Patna-16...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Taj Online india Pvt. ltd.Mafatial Chamber, 3rd floor, B- Bulid...

Case Number: 436

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2022

Chandigarh

Sri Chaitanya Educational Institute V/S Ankit Singla

Institute  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Adv.Ankit Aggarwal

Respondant Advocate Amit Sharma, Adv.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:43/2020Date of Institution:21.01.2020Date of Decision:11.08.2022Ankit Singla, S/o Mr. Anupam Singla R/o H.No.2, Sector 18, Panchkula through his legal guardian/father Mr. Anupam Singla S/o Sh....

Case Number: 43

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2022

Maharashtra

1.ALLEN CAREER INSTITUTE THROUGH DIRECTOR V/S MR. PRAMOD S CHAWAN

Institute  

Court Name: Thane

Appelant Advocate ADV ASHWINI SARJINE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 379

|

Date of Filing: 05-07-2022

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2022

Karnataka

The National Institute of Technology V/S Mr. Nishanth Aradhya.S

Institute  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Sri. K.S. Raghuram

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 8TH FLOOR, B.W.S.S.B BUILDING, K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE-09Complaint Case No. CC/519/2020( Date of Filing : 13 Aug 2020 )1. Mr. Nishanth Aradhya.SS/o Sri. Sadananda, Aged about 19 Years,Residing at Site No.670,60ft Road,4th Stage BEML Lay...

Case Number: 519

|

Date of Filing: 13-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Ganga Sheel Advanced Medical Research Institute & Others V/S Vijendra Singh

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: Bareilly-I

Appelant Advocate Atul Singh

Respondant Advocate Pramod Kr. Gupta

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2022

Rajasthan

INFRAME DESIGN INSTITUTE V/S RAVINDAR BHATI

Institute  

Court Name: Jodhpur

Appelant Advocate PRAKASH BHATI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2022

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2022

Uttarakhand

Akash Institute V/S Naresh kumar

Institute  

Court Name: Dehradun

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 431

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2022

Tamil Nadu

John F.Divyan V/S The Vice Chancellor. Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science University

University   Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K.Sukumaran

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 281

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2023

Andhra Pradesh

Chairman, Kakinada Institute of Technology and Science, Tirupathi Village V/S Chintalapati Pavan Kumar

Institute  

Court Name: East Godavari

Appelant Advocate Md.Naseeruddin

Respondant Advocate K.V.S.Ramana Murthy

Case Number: 29

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.