Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
SAROJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V/S ANOOP KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: Lucknow-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2023
Kashi Institute of Pharmacy V/S Arvind Gupta
Court Name: Varanasi
Appelant Advocate A. K. Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 253
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2023
1.The director, Nizams Institute of Mediacal Sciences, V/S 1. Smt.Masanam Madhavi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. P.Munikrishna Reddy
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2023
Abhishek Soni V/S Baba Banarasi Das Institute
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Alok Ranjan
Respondant Advocate No Advocate(op)
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/613( Date of Filing : 25 Mar 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Baba Banarasi Das Institutea..........
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2023
Sri Chaitanya Institute V/S Neha Khetarpal
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 1145 OF 2019Neha Khetarpal Vs Sri Chaitanya Institute (Varsity Education Management Pvt. Ltd.)BEFORE: PAWANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Com...
Case Number: 1145
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2019
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2023
The Centre Superitendent, Central Institute of Hotel V/S Kumari Kabita Kar
Court Name: Kandhamal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMAR DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONAT-NEAR COLLECTORATE OFFICE,PHULBANIComplaint Case No. CC/69/2022( Date of Filing : 16 Nov 2022 )1. Kumari Kabita KarD/O- Sri Biranchi Narayan Kar AT- Phulbani Sahi, PO- Phulbani DIST- Kandhamal, 762001 KandhamalOdisha...........Comp...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2023
AKASH INSTITUTE V/S SARATH S
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/23/19( Date of Filing : 10 Jan 2023 )1. SARATH SPERINGALAH HOUSE, PYARI JUNCTION, THOPPUMPADY , KOCHI 682005...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AKASH INSTITUTE2ND FLOOR , COASTAL CHEMBERS, OPP. MERCY ESTATE ...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2023
Anuj Kumar V/S Dr.Ambedekar Institute of Technology for Handicapped
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/56/2023( Date of Filing : 25 Jan 2023 )InFirst Appeal No. A/316/20151. Dr.Ambedekar Institute of Technology for HandicappedAvadhpuri...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2023
M/s Shivamogga Institute of Medical Sciences V/S Rajendra Kishore,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G R Anantharam & Associates
Respondant Advocate SBT-1 & 2-svd(p.p)
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/180/2015( Date of Filing : 11 Feb 2015 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/08/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/42/2013 of District Shimoga)1. Rajendra Kishore,A/a 33 years, S/o Sri...
Case Number: 180
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2023
BABU BANARSIDAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V/S AKASH CHAUHAN
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.