Court Name: Tumkur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2020
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate J.P.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/582 M/s Vidya Vikas Institute of Engineering & Technology ...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Rajdeep Goyal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRCT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001Execution Application(EA) No. EA/10/35 Shashi Pal Saini ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Aakash Institute ...........R...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.B. MUDGIL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1999 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 22/02/2010 in Appeal No. 335/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. PANDIT BHAGWAN DAYAL SHARMA POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESPost Graduae Institute o...
Case Number: 1999
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. REETESH SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2724 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 17/11/2008 in Appeal No. 502/2008 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLINGA-24,/25, Institutional Area Sector. 62 Noida -201301 ..........
Case Number: 2724
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 28-07-2010
Hospital Medical Institute Education
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate B.B.Sobti
Respondant Advocate Rajesh Garg
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 215 of 2009 1. Seema GuptaR/o # 99, Street No. 3, Ram Nagar, Bhamian Kalan, Ludhiana ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nehru Hospital Post Graduate Inst...
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.P.KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate NONE
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/1287(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. cc/08/20 of District Raigarh) 1. INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENTITM COMPLEX.25/26,INSTITUTIONAL AREA SECTOR-4,KHARGHA...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 72 OF 2010 1. RAVI KUMARR/o KG-1/543, Vikas PuriNew Delhi - 110 018Delhi ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT - KOZHIKODEDirector, Indian Institute of Management-Kozhikode, Kunna...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2010
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 357 of 2010 1. Dhiraj manonS/o Sh. N.K.manon R/o House No. 66 (FF) Milk Colony Dhanas Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Institute of Advance S...
Case Number: 357
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Adv.C R Kamath
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCC NO. 164 Of 2010 1. PREMARAJAN PPADANNAM PILAKKAL,MANASSERRY PO,MUKKOM,KOZHIKODE ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. WELL CARE INSTITUTE OF SPEECH HEARING(WISH)NEAR,NASEERA DRIVING SCHOOL,KOVUR,KOZHIKODE,MEDICAL COLLEGE ...........Responde...
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.