Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
MANAGER, DISASTER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE V/S NAVAL SINGH
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2017
C.E.D.MEDICAPES INSTITUTE V/S VIRENDRA ROSHAN
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2016
POST OF GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH V/S NAMRATA KATARIA & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJOY KUMAR GHOSH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 196 OF 20091. NAMRATA KATARIA & ORS.W/o Late Sh. Naresh Kataria, R/o 79, Green Model TownJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. POST OF GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCHThrough i...
Case Number: 196
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2011
Nalanda Institute of Engineering & Technology, V/S Shaik Samdani,
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate Sri G.Punna Reddy
Respondant Advocate exparte,
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/240/20101. Shaik Samdani,S/o. Shaik Muneer, R/o. D.No.26-1-108, 1st line, Nagarampalem, Guntur. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. A Hazarath Rao PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. SMT T. SUNEETHA, M.S.W., B.L., MEMBERHONORABLE Sri M.V.L. Radha Kri...
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ROHINI RAJESH SALVI V/S RG STONE UROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JEEVAN PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate M/S. PAREKH & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3309 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 04/03/2010 in Appeal No. 154/2009 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. RG STONE UROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE21-A, 14-A Road, Ahinsa Marg, Khar (West)MumbaiMaharas...
Case Number: 3309
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2011
INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY (I.B.M.T.) BANGALORE & ANR. V/S KUMARI ASTHA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH MUTHA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJESH MAHALE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 985 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 10/11/2009 in Appeal No. 525/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. KUMARI ASTHA & ANR.Resident of 156, Vakil ColonyBhilwaraRajasthan2. DR. SHANTI LAL RANKA, S/O....
Case Number: 985
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2011
SATYESH SHRIVASTAVA V/S DIRECTOR, SAMRAT ASHOK TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2017
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2016
RAHUL MAHAJAN V/S THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHITKARA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY AND ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate BRIJENDER CHAHAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 142 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 26/10/2006 in Appeal No. 796/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHITKARA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY AND ANR.HEAD OFFICE ,...
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2011
M.D,Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt.Ltd V/S Vivekananda Educational Devlopment Institute for Citizens
Court Name: Ganjam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR. Complaint Case No. CC/115/2007( Date of Filing : 21 May 2007 )1. Vivekananda Educational Devlopment Institute for Citizens(VEDIC) Rep. by its Secretary General, Satish Ku.Panigrahi,Gajapatinagar-11th lane, Berham...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.