Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
SAAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL INSTITUTE V/S HARSHADBHAI CHANDRASHANKAR DAVE
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate MANOJ S. BHAVSAR
Respondant Advocate M.K.JOSHI
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2020
Institute of Clinical Research V/S M.B.Dinakar
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. 1835/2011( Date of Filing : 01 Oct 2011 )1. M.B.DinakarBangalore...........Complainant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 1835
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2022
Gurunanak Institute of Engineering and Technology Through Principal V/S Ku.Jishita Shriharirao Raouri
Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Rafiq Shaikh/Bhimgade
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 55 Of 20111. Ku.Jishita Shriharirao RaouriR/o Rajendra Nagar Ward,Near Kalpna Lodge,Tah.BallarpurChandrapurM.S............Complainant(s)Versus1. Gurunanak Institute of Engineering and Technology Through PrincipalDahegaon,Infront I.O.C.Petrol Pump,Kalmeshwar Road,NagpurM.S....
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Institute of nursing college V/S Ashwini Ramdev Patil
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate R.K.Singh
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/90/20111. Ashwini Ramdev PatilDevala,Vardha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Institute of nursing collegeSatpur ,nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. R.S.Pailwan PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. V.V.Dani MEMBER PRESENT:R.K.Singh, Advocate for the Compla...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MAHAVEER V/S GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2017
SAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL INSTITUTE V/S NAVRATNMAL RATANLAL MITTAL
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate DR.RAJENDRA D.
Respondant Advocate M.J.PARIKH+NILAY DAVE
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2021
AHMEDABAD INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY V/S CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CENTRE+VINODBHAI B. VAGHELA
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate D.C.MEHTA
Respondant Advocate SELF
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2021
Indian Institute of fasion Technoligy V/S Mrs. Shyni Shivakumar
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/1718/2011( Date of Filing : 16 Sep 2011 )1. Mrs. Shyni Shivakumar Bangalore 79.............
Case Number: 1718
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2022
Banglore Institute of Managment and Studies V/S Anilkumar Goel
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 760
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2022
Distarict Hospital and Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences and Technological Hospital V/S Sri.Ajay
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate Sri.B.R.Jagadeesh
Respondant Advocate Sri.S.L.Ramesh Babu
MANDYA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMD.C. Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises,Mandya - 571401.Complaint Case No. CC/10/1351. Sri.AjayS/o Bhagya, Minor Rep. by natural Guardian and next Friend his Mother Bhagya W/o Kumar, R/at C/o M.Mahadev, KSRTC Bus Driver,...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.