Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vikas Goyal, Adv. for the applicant/appellant
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 325 of 2011 1. The Swami Vivekanand Institute of Engineering and Technology Chandigarh-Patiala HighwayRam Nagar (Near Banur) (Pun...
Case Number: 325
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sanjay Kasture
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/10/4731. Shri Harvindersingh Indrajeetsingh WalhaR/o. D-14, Sunder Apartment, Kalamna Road, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra...........Compl...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sanjay Kasture
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/10/4741. Shri Santosh Kishor AnandPlot No. 63, Baba Budhaji Nagar, Teka Naka, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sanjay M. Kasture
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/10/5461. Shri Vipul Anil SharmaPlot No. 29, utkarsh Avantika, Flat No. 103, Near Gurudwara, Ramdaspeth, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra.......
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 58 of 2011 1. Manjeet KaurW/o Surjeet Singh, R/O Village - Sahouli, Teh & Distt - Ludhiana, PunjabLudhianaPb ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research ChanidgarhP.G.I.M.E.R, Ch...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 25 of 2011 1. Chamkaur Singhson of Harbans Singh R/o House No. 23 Block-A Commando Complex Phase-XI SAS nagar MOhali ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences(PGI)(PGI) Sector-12 Chandigah...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 661 of 2010 1. Abhishek Mengison of Virender Kumar R/o House No. 3413 SEctor-47/D Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Birla Instituteof Technology & Sciences Pilani(BITSAT) Rajasthan Through its Managing Principal O...
Case Number: 661
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Denesh Goyal & Amandeep Saini
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 39 of 2011 1. Arushi GoelD/o Shri S.K. Goel, R/o # 1004, Sector 24, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. National Law Institute University,thro...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate M.D.Thacker
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2020
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate P.Thulasipathi Naidu
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/11/18011. Miss A.Divya Latha D/o Bhaskar Naidu aged about 21 YearsResiding at Door No.8-151, Jendaman Street, Ch...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.