Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIBHHA DATTA MAKHIJA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4073 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/12/2007 in Appeal No. 51/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY & ANR ( MINISTRY OF TEXTILES, GOVT. OF INDIA ), NIFT CAMD...
Case Number: 4073
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2012
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNURCC NO. 15 Of 20121. Sabitha MThamanna House, peringadi po, Kannur Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Managing Director, The Malabar Institute of Medical Science, Mini Bye pass Road, Govindapuram PO, 673016KozhikodeKerala2. Dr. ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUN KUMAR KHATRI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 271 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1030/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MANISH KUMAR DALALS/o Sh Baljeet Singh, R/o Pana Manayari Village, Chhara Tehsil,BahadurgarhJha...
Case Number: 271
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR. A.V.PATWARDHAN
Respondant Advocate MRS.KRISHNA SHARMA
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/07/1831. METROPOLITAN HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE LTD.204, TRIMURTI ARCADE, NEAR SARVODAYA HOSPITAL, L.B.S.MARG, GHATKOPAR(W), MUMBAI-400086............Complainant(s)...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.RadhaKrishnan
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. 101/2007(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. RekhaKolathapillil mana,Vadakkakkad,Chavakad BEFORE: Smt.A.RADHA PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERKERALA STATE CON...
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv.ANTHONY
Respondant Advocate Adv.J.C.Shukla
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/1371. Sau. Soniya Meriyan Fransis136, Trade Line, P M Ray Building, Mohan NagarNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/1661. Mrs. Sanjana H. Achari4/7,Anandnagar Paud RoadPune-29Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.MITVISION An Institute Having Office7/B,Rambuag Colony,Paud Road,KothrudPune-38Maharashtra2. 2. Mr.Sudam Choure,Director,MIT VISION,Pune7/B,Rambaug C...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/3181. Kaushal Kumar Singh1, Hind Motor, Hooghly.HooghlyWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Institute of Engineers (India)8, Gokhel Road, Kolkata-700020.KolkataWest Bengal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Sankar Nath Das PRESIDENTHO...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/2691. Sou, Josna Jayant PundalikD/7,Loksangham Vihar,New DP Road,AundhPune-7Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Shri Raj Pathak,Cheif Executive,National Institute Of Art & Craft MISC3rd Floor,Sagar Hight,Balajinagar,Opp Balajinagar Bus Stop,Pune-...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 308 of 2011 1. NIFD Institute of FashionSCO 32-35, Sector 8/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Pro-Eye Protection World (Pvt.) Ltd,through its Director, Anoop Singh, SCO No. 126-127, (2nd Floor), Sector 34,...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.