Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/10/461. Mr. Ashok Laltaprasad GuptaRoom No.3, Nav Jeevan Housing Society, Julius Wadi, Gate No.6, Malvani Colony, Malad-West,...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 27/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1526/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GUNCHA MITTALR/O 114NAROTTAM NAGAR KHANNA-141401 (PB)............Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAYAT IN...
Case Number: 1875
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2012
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Unit-I, Kolkatahttp://confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/09/3521. Tapas Kr. Paik and 4 othersDhaniakhali, Hooghly,Pin-712302. HooghlyWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Director, Indian Institute of Professional and 3 others14, Congres...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Hospital Institute Eye Hospital
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D.Mohanan
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/09/206(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/02/2009 in Case No. OP 343/03 of District Thiruvananthapuram)1. ThankammaKerala...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Gr...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. BAJAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 114 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/02/2012 in Complaint No. 334/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ADESH PRASAD JAISWALS/o Shri Banwari Lal Jaiswal, R/o Mohalla Delezakpur, Hazaripur Road, Gorakhpur-...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, Adv. for the appellants
Respondant Advocate Sh.Rajesh Garg, Adv. for the respondents
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 211 of 2011 1. Jug Jeevan PalS/o Late Sh. Ajmer Nath aged about 39 years, H.No. 4810/3, Chowk Ghandan, Near Pipli Bazar, Ambala C...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 119 of 2012 1. Manprit Singhaged 24 Yeras S/o Sh. Jaswinder Singh House No. 1172-B Sector-46/B Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Gurukul Vidyapeeth Institute of Engineering& Technology( through Manager Admissi...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. M.G. LAW AFFILIATES
Respondant Advocate MS. SHIPRA MATHUR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 08/08/2006 in Complaint No. C-268/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SEIENCESANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI - 29 -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. S.C...
Case Number: 165
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. M.G. LAW AFFILITES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 496 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 08/08/2006 in Complaint No. 268/1995 of the State Commission Delhi)1. S.C. MATHUR AND ORS.182, ASHOKA ENCLAVE - 1 FARIDABAD 121003...........Appellant(s)Versus1. ALL INDIA INS...
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2012
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 84 of 2012 1. sh. Daljit Singh son of Late Ram Singh, r/o House No. 203, Advocates Enclave, Sector 49-A, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. H...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.