Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
BHANWAR LAL V/S SANTOKBA DURLABHJI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHUTOSH BHATIA, NARENDRA KUMAR GAUTAM, ABHISHEK GUPTA & PURUSHOTTAM S.T.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1261 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/12/2011 in Appeal No. 651/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SANTOKBA DURLABHJI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE & ANR.Bhawani Singh margJai...
Case Number: 1261
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2012
Malanad Hospital and Institute of oncology Super Speciality V/S H.C. Eranna,
Court Name: Shimoga
Appelant Advocate Shyamala Shastry
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2020
ANSAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V/S SAHIL CHOPRA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SOM NATH CHUCHRA (AUTH. REP.)
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 143 OF 20121. SAHIL CHOPRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ANSAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER ...
Case Number: 143
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2012
BIMAL KUMAR GHOSH V/S ILS HOSPITAL (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS INSTITUTE OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY) & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARTHA SIL & ABHISHEK SARKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SUBRATA DASS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 376 OF 2012 IN FA/114/20091. ILS HOSPITAL (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS INSTITUTE OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY) & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. BIMAL KUMAR GHOSH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: H...
Case Number: 376
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2012
DIRECTOR,RKDF INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY V/S NISHUL PATEL
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
DIRECTOR,RKDF INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY V/S SHIVAKAR PATEL
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2016
DIRECTOR,RKDF INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY V/S SHUBHAM PATEL
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh V/S Jaswinder Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Nitesh Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 28 of 2012 1. Jaswinder Kumar ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandiga...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. V/S INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES IN EDUCATION UNIVERSITY
University Institute Education
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 20111. INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES IN EDUCATION UNIVERSITYGandhi Vidhya Mandhir, Sardarshar,ChuruRajasthan...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SUNIL KUMAR & ORS.R/o Village,Parli Paryal.P.O Samou...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2012
1. L.V.PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE, REP BY RUPESH KUMAR, INSTITUTE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR AND V/S J. SONA SINGH, S/O AKTHAR SINGH, R/O 2-1-1074/GF, YELLAMMA BANDS,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S METU GOVERDHAN REDDY
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/71/20111. J. SONA SINGH, S/O AKTHAR SINGH, R/O 2-1-1074/GF, YELLAMMA BANDS,GURUNANAK COLONY, KUKATPALLY, R.R.DIST............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. L.V.PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE, REP BY RUPESH KUMAR, INSTITUTE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, R/O BAN...
Case Number: 71
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.