Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
PRIYANK DILIP KHOKARE V/S NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR JAYESH MORE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/905(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/11/2010 in Case No. 204/10 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT201 MIRMAN INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BEHIND CHINCHOLI FIRE...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ASIAN INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES. & ORS V/S MR. SHRUTI RAMAKANT SHAHASANE
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/12/3221. MR. SHRUTI RAMAKANT SHAHASANERAMAKANT VINAYAK SHAHASANE A/22 KRISHNAGIRI, NEAR NATIONAL PARK, NEAR NATIONAL PARK, KU...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PRATHIMA INSTIUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,KARIMNAGAR A.P. V/S STUDENT OF PRATHIMA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, KARIMANAGAR, A.P.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISAR CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. MANIDER SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 4 OF 20041. STUDENT OF PRATHIMA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, KARIMANAGAR, A.P.NAGUNUR KARIMANAGAR SCIENCES A.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. PRATHIMA INSTIUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,KARIMNAGAR A.P.MEDIC...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2004
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2012
SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. V/S INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES IN EDUCATION UNIVERSITY
University Institute Education
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 546 OF 2012 IN TA/25/20111. INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES IN EDUCATION UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SUNIL KUMAR & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHO...
Case Number: 546
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2012
ADANI INSTITUTE OF ANFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT V/S PIYUSH RAKESHBHAI SHARMA
Court Name: Gandhinagar
Appelant Advocate BHADRESH.M.RATHOD
Respondant Advocate V.M.PANCHOLI
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2017
M/S. KEMPEGOWDA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE &ANR. V/S SHANTA V.GOWDA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJANI K.PRASAD
Respondant Advocate MR. E.C. VIDYASAGAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 426 OF 2012 IN FA/74/20051. SHANTA V.GOWDA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. KEMPEGOWDA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE &ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN...
Case Number: 426
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2012
Chaithanya Eye Hospital and Research Institute V/S Ajitha Jayakumar
Hospital Institute Eye Hospital
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/11/2561. Ajitha JayakumarTC 23/927, Jaya Nivas, ValiyasalaTVM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Chaithanya Eye Hospital and Research InstituteKesavadasapuramTVM............Opp....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CEO, Calcutta Medical Research Institute V/S Chira Ranjan Dass
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Unit-I, Kolkatahttp://confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/12/861. Chira Ranjan Dass101/A, Santosh Roy Road, Barisha, Kolkata-700008.KolkataWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. CEO, Calcutta Medical Research Institute7/2, Diamond Harbour Road, Kol...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
VINAY GUPTA INSTITUTE OF STUDYS V/S VIJAY SONI
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2016
CHARAN SINGH INSTITUTE V/S SANDEEP KUMAR
Court Name: Alwar
Appelant Advocate MANOJ KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 945
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-06-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.