Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
DIRECTOR, CHANAKYA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND RESEARCH V/S SHRI ABHISEK SHAH
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/159(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/01/2012 in Case No. 653/2008 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. SHRI ABHISEK SHAHB/3 LAXMI KUNJ INFRONT OF LOKMANYA TILAK LIBRARY ZAKERIA ROAD M...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RICHA YADAV V/S INSTITUTE OF DENTAL EDUCATION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2016
SRI J. VIVEKANANDA, S/O J.R.K.RAO, V/S PRASAD V.POTLURI (P.V.P) INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, K. SRINIVASULU,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/702/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/06/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/48/2011 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)1. PRASAD V.POTLURI (P.V.P) INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, K. SRINIVASULU,KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT............A...
Case Number: 702
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER ACCOUNTS & ANR. V/S AKSHAY INFOTECH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 528 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/07/2012 in Complaint No. 103/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. AKSHAY INFOTECHThrough its Properietor, Smt. Kusum Lata, 111/434, Agarwal Farm, Mansarovar Jaipu...
Case Number: 528
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2012
BIRLA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH THROUGH NIDESHAK V/S KAMAL MOOLCHANDANI
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 757
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2016
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & ANR. V/S SHALUAT KUMAR JAIN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3316 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/08/2011 in Appeal No. 223/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHALUAT KUMAR JAIN...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & ANR.............
Case Number: 3316
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2012
PRINCIPAL,SRI RAM INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT V/S DHARMESH KUMAR CHOUBEY
Court Name: Jabalpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT V/S ANIL V. ANAND & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. SHINOJ NARAYANAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3617 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 6/2011 of the State Commission Kerala)1. ANIL V. ANAND & ANR.48/349 Chihira, Virammel lane, Perandur, Elamakkara, ErnakulanCochin - 682 026...
Case Number: 3617
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2012
VIDYA BHUSAN JAIN & OTHERS V/S SITARAM BHARTIYA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHIRAMEL & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. GURMEET BINDRA & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 362 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 20/04/2007 in Complaint No. C 322/1997 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SITARAM BHARTIYA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCHCENTER FOR HEALTH CARE & CENTER B 16 MEHRAULIT INST A...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2012
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING V/S AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3019 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/07/2012 in Appeal No. 121/2010 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)1. AJAY KUMAR GUPTAS/o Raj Naryan Gupta R/o Dyand Nagri, Pargana,Jwalapur,TehsilHaridwarUttran...
Case Number: 3019
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.