Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s V.Chaitanya latha
Respondant Advocate M/s A.Venkatesh
First Appeal No. FA/845/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. cc/24/2009 of District Hyderabad-II)1. M.Krishna Rao S/o M.Godavari, 58 yrs., Occ: Rtd., Bank Manager, 48-7-47, First floor, Srinagar, Ramatalkies side market road, Visakapatnam...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 845
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAGHENTH BASANT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/01/2012 in Complaint No. 295/1992 of the State Commission Kerala)1. SREE CHITHIRA THIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGY & ANR.Represented by its Medical...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JITENDRA SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 516 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/10/2011 in Complaint No. 4/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SMT. GOVIND KANWARW/o Shri Govind Singh Rathore R/o Lamba Khurd, Todaraisingh, Dist-Tonk, Presentl...
Case Number: 516
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DHRUV KUMRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 607 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/08/2012 in Complaint No. 37/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. N.K. HANDAS/o. Late Sh. S.L. Handa, R/o. Q-24, Old Double Storey, Lajpat Nagar-4,NEW DELHI-110024.......
Case Number: 607
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAN BHARTI & MD. KAUSAR PERVEZ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1718 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/04/2011 in Appeal No. 197/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SAROJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENTThrough its AR 8 Maal AvenueLucknowU.P............
Case Number: 1718
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2012
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate K.s.Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/4831. Kamaljit kaurw/o Jagjit singh r/o H.No.15122,Kothe amarpura,joganand road,near thermal colony,bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1777 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/03/2012 in Appeal No. 317/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY & 3 ORS.Bhil Chhappar ,through its Chariman,Shri Pa...
Case Number: 1777
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHOK TRIVEDI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 458 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 30/09/2009 in Complaint No. 5/2005 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. KU. FARAH FAROOQUID/o Sh. Ahmed Farooqui, R/o House No. 127, Near Trimurty Chwok, Sunder NagarR...
Case Number: 458
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMINDER LAL & MS. RAJNI OHRI LAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 675 OF 2012 IN FA/7/20121. NITIN MINHAS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SHOOLINI INSTITUTE OF LIFE SCIENCES AND BUISNESS MANAGEMENT AND ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUS...
Case Number: 675
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMINDER LAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 677 OF 2012 IN FA/13/20121. NAVENDU SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SHOOLINI INSTITUTE OF LIFE SCIENCES AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JU...
Case Number: 677
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.