Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JEEVAN PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate MR. COL. K. DIGAMBER SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 13/04/2006 in Complaint No. 1354/2006 of the State Commission Tripura)1. COL. Y.P. SINGH (RETD)S/O.LATE G..SINGH, R/O.D-95, SAKET, MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH...........Appella...
Case Number: 444
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2007
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2012
Medical All India Institute Of Medical Sciences Institute
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIBHOR GARG, MR. ANCHIT SHARMA, MR. RAJAT KATYAL & MR. SANJEEV JOSHI
Respondant Advocate M/S. RAJESH MAHNA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 731 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 03/10/2006 in Complaint No. 362/1994 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESTHROUGH MEDICAL SUPTD. ANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI - 110029...........A...
Case Number: 731
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.A. CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate M/S. MG LAW AFFILIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 114 OF 19991. TILAT CHAUDHARY & ANR.W/O SH. NIHAL AZMAT CHOURDHARYR/O C - 66 SECTOR - JALIGNJ LUCKNOW - 2260242. nananana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCEANSARI NAGAR...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-1999
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PT SAMA SINGH & MR. BHAWANI SHANKER SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4074 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/08/2012 in Appeal No. 1555/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. ANKIT SHARMAS/o Sh. Ramesh Kumar Sharma, R/o C-4/G, Vijeta Vihar, Sector-13,RohiniDELHI - 11...
Case Number: 4074
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PT SAMA SINGH & MR. BHAWANI SHANKER SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4075 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/08/2012 in Appeal No. 1577/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. LOKESH YADAVS/h Sh. Surender Yadav R/o C-17/G,Vijeta Vihar, Sector-13,Rohini DELHI - 110085....
Case Number: 4075
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2012 IN RP/3019/20121. AJAY KUMAR GUPTA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING M...
Case Number: 182
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-11-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Mithun Kumar Singh.
Respondant Advocate Mr. Mortaj Ali.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGALBHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027FA No: 92 Of 2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/11/2010 in Case No. 42/S/2010 of District Siliguri)1. Institute of Computer Accountants.A Division of ICA Infotech ...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KESAR DASS B & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VINOD PANT & MS. RINKI GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 686 OF 2012 IN RP/3161/20121. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF BANKING & FINANCE (IIBF)...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MUKUL SRIVASTAVA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, ...
Case Number: 686
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2012
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Comp. in person
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 21 of 2012 1. Sourabh SihagR/o VPO Taza Patti, Tehsil Abohar, Distt. Ferozpur, Pb. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Regional Institute of Cooperative M...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Comp. in person
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 39 of 2012 1. Ankur r/o 35, Master Colony, Dinanagar, Distt. Gurdaspur. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Regional Institute of Cooperative ManagementSe...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.