company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

NCDRC

CHACHAN EDUCATION & WELFARE SOCIETIES OF INSTITUTE V/S MOHIT MATHUR

Institute   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SIDDHARTH JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2991 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1120/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MOHIT MATHURS/o Sh. Madan Lal Mathur, R/o Nai Sarak, Mohalla Ladia,AlwarRajasthan..............

Case Number: 2991

|

Date of Filing: 13-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2013

Madhya Pradesh

ARISE INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT V/S SMT.MOHINI MISHRA

Institute  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 28-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2016

West Bengal

National Insurance Co. Ltd. and 3 others V/S North Eastern Regional Institute of Science & Technology

National Insurance   Institute  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Unit-I, Kolkatahttp://confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/09/4521. North Eastern Regional Institute of Science & TechnologyNirjuli, Pin-791109.West Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and 3 others3, Middleton Stre...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Girafe Learning Institute V/S Ajay Shankar Tiwari

Institute  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1633

|

Date of Filing: 13-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-03-2022

Madhya Pradesh

PRECEDENT MILENIYAM GROUP OF INSTITUTE V/S SURESH SINGH SO RR SINGH

Institute  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate DIWAKAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 670

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-06-2017

Karnataka

Indian Institute of Planning and Management V/S Janice Rose Correa,

Institute  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/288/2012( Date of Filing : 10 Sep 2012 )1. Janice Rose Correa,D/o Maxim Ronald Correa, Aged 21 years, R/a. Flat No 202, Oasis Apartments, Arya Samaj Road, Balmatta, Mangalore 57...

Case Number: 288

|

Date of Filing: 10-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2019

Maharashtra

BOMBAY SCIENCE & RESERCH EDUCATION INSTITUTE V/S SHRI AJIT ANUPAM

Institute   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate YUWRAJ D PATIL

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/2791. SHRI AJIT ANUPAMA-1 PANCHAWATI APARTMENT NEAR KHODIYAR MANDIR CHOWK 4 ADJAN GRAM SURAT THROUGH POWER ATTORNEY HOLDER SOW MANGAL KALIDAS LONDHE RESIDENT OF NEAR VITHA...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

BOMBAY SCIENCE & RESERCH EDUCATION INSTITUTE V/S SHRI SANTOSH KALIDAS LONDHE

Institute   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate YUWRAJ D PATIL

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/2801. SHRI SANTOSH KALIDAS LONDHENEAR VITHAL RUKHAMINI TEMPLE RAMNAGAR WAGHALE ESTATE THANE - 400604 THROUGH THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SOW MANGAL KALIDAS LONDHE RESIDEN...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

BOMBAY SCIENCE & RESERCH EDUCATION INSTITUTE V/S SHRI VIJAY RAJ KARUNANIDHI

Institute   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate YUWRAJ D PATIL

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/2811. SHRI VIJAY RAJ KARUNANIDHIH NO 622 F SAKTI STREET ARCOT ROAD BACK SIDE OF WISDOM VIDLYASARAM SCHOOL M G R NAGAR T V MALAI CHEYYAR THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SO...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Sims Institute V/S Vivek S.Sisodiya.

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.