Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
DIRECTOR NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY V/S DIVYA ABRAHAM
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DIVYA ABRAHAM
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/12/816(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/06/2012 in Case No. CC/10/209 of District Kozhikode)1. DIVYA ABRAHAMCHERAYIL HOUSE,NEAR MUTTOM CHURCH,CHERTHALAALAPPUZHAKERALA...........Appell...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Vandana Singh V/S Saroj Institute Of Technology
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dev Kumar Tripathi
Respondant Advocate
......
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2022
L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE V/S GANDHAM SREERAMA MURTHY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. T. ANAMIKA
Respondant Advocate MR. G. TUSHAR RAO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 177 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 30/12/2005 in Complaint No. 140/2001 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. GANDHAM SREERAMA MURTHYSAPHIRE COMPLEX, BEHIND TOPAZ BUILDING AMRUTHA HILLS, PANJAGUTTA, HYDERABA...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2013
1.KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES V/S KAMMA SANJEEV RAO
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.LAXMAN AND G.MANOJMAHARAJ,
Respondant Advocate G.SUDARSHAN REDDY-OP1&OP2
First Appeal No. CC/44/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/02/2010 in Case No. 737/2010 of District East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry)1. KAMMA SANJEEV RAOBODHAN MANDAL, NIZAMABADNIZAMABADANDHRA PRADESH...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1.KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESMINISTER ROAD...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
KEERTI BHATIA V/S ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. L.K. PASSI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4376 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/09/2012 in Appeal No. 1864/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. ASIA PACIFIC INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENTThrough its Authorized Representative, 3,4 Institutional...
Case Number: 4376
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2013
ARUN KUMAR V/S ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2016
Gokhale Institute of Pollitics and Economics V/S Raj kumar Akela
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/5361. Raj kumar AkelaHouse No.89 A,Galii No.6,Bhagwat Colony Sant Nagar Burari,Delhi 110084PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Gokhale Institute of Pollitics and EconomicsBMCC Road,Deccan Gymkhana,Pune411004PuneMaha............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: S...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Pracharya, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society Institute of Information Technology, V/S Madan Shankar Mane,
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/12/6041. Madan Shankar Mane,32/8, Sukhdham Apartment, Mahesh Housing Society, Bibavewadi, Pune-37.PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Pracharya, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society Institute of Information Technology,Kenedi Road, Pune-01.PuneMaha2....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MANAGER SHREE,TATA TELE SERVICES PVT.LTD. V/S GUJARAT ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Court Name: Gandhinagar
Appelant Advocate R.M.PATEL
Respondant Advocate A.P.MEHTA
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2017
L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE & ANR. V/S J. SONA SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. METTU GOVERDHAN REDDY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 566 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/07/2012 in Complaint No. 71/2011 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. J. SONA SINGHS/O. AKTHAR SINGH, R/O. H NO. 2-1-1074/GF, YELLAMMA BANDA, GURUNANAK COLONY, KU...
Case Number: 566
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.