Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
DR.D.P.PANDEY V/S NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2016
M/S KOKILABEN DHIRUBHAI AMBANI HOPSITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE V/S SMT SAROJ VIJAYKUMAR TALWAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR SANJEEV AGAWANE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/191. SMT SAROJ VIJAYKUMAR TALWAR FLAT NO 9 MONALISA AVM MARG JVPD SCHEME MUMBAI 400049MUMBIAMAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S KOKILABEN DHIRUBHAI AMBANI HO...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ESCORT HEART INSTITUTE & RESEARCH CENTRE LTD. V/S S.P. KHARE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RIJU RAJ JAMWAL, MR. BIJOY KUMAR PRADHAN & MS. JYOTHIKA PHUKAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 608 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/07/2012 in Complaint No. 135/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. S.P. KHARES/O. ALTE SHRI. B.B.L, KHARE, R/O. A-22, MACHNA COLONY, BHOPALM.P...........Appellant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 608
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-02-2013
The Director,Calcutta Institute Of Technology. V/S SUSANTA KUMAR NATH.
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892Complaint Case No. CC/12/1721. SUSANTA KUMAR NATH.11, Golam Hossain Sardar Lane, P.S.- Shibpur, Howrah-711 102............
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT V/S KU. NAMRATA JAIN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2016
KU. NAMRATA JAIN V/S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2016
THE DIRECTOR & DEAN INSTITUTE OF ARMAMENT OF TECHNOLOGY V/S SRI MOHAMMED ABDUL HAI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate S.S.SONWALKAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 396 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 04/06/2007 in Complaint No. 10/1996 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. SRI MOHAMMED ABDUL HAIH NO 23-1-689/4 MOGHAL PURA HYDERABAD...........Appellant(s)Versus1. THE DI...
Case Number: 396
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2013
Swami Vivekanand Institute of Engineering and Technology, V/S Ashima Soni
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gagan Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 5 of 2012 1. Ashima SoniR/o # 5759, Sector 38/West, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Swami Vivekanand Institute of Engineering and ...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DEEPESH KUMAR AVASTHI V/S MANAGER, MEHRISHI ARVIND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR
Respondant Advocate DR. RAJEEV SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2787 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1219/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MANAGER, MEHRISHI ARVIND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYMadhyam Marg, Mansarovar,JaipurRajasthan.......
Case Number: 2787
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2013
The Director, Institute of Distance Education V/S Myana Muralidhar
Court Name: Karimnagar
Appelant Advocate S.V Ramana Rao
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.