company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

NCDRC

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW & ANR. V/S ARVIND GALAV

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI, MS. SHWETA KAPOOR, MR. R.K. KAPOOR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2013 IN RP/310/20131. ARVIND GALAV...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LAW & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERH...

Case Number: 262

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2013

Gujarat

SUNIL SIR, INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLYING STAFF. V/S BHOI JAYANTKUMAR BHARATBHAI.

Institute  

Court Name: Ahmedabad City

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 15-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2020

West Bengal

Chittaranjan Advanced Medical Referral Institute V/S Suresh Show

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: Burdwan

Appelant Advocate Baidyanath Roy

Respondant Advocate Monikeswar Ghosh and Kalyan Roy

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM166 Nivedita Pally, Muchipara, G.T. Road, P.O. Sripally,Dist Burdwan - 713103Complaint Case No. CC/104/20061. Suresh ShowS/O Sri Ram Swaroop Show, Ambagan P.S. Hirapur P.O. Burnpur, Subdivision Asansol Dist Burdwan...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 104

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2017

NCDRC

L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE & ANR. V/S J. SONA SINGH

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. METTU GOVERDHAN REDDY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2013 IN FA/566/20121. J. SONA SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE...

Case Number: 155

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2013

Madhya Pradesh

Manish Giri V/S Director Samrat ashok Tec Institute Vidishaa

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Bhabha Engineering Research Institute V/S Mr Rajesh Kumar Sahu

Institute  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 28-12-2020

Madhya Pradesh

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMERSE V/S AMIT BAPNA

Institute  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1159

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 11-08-2016

Andhra Pradesh

GORLE MURALI KRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 21 YEARS, V/S GOKUL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCES,

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S K. SRINIVASA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MR. G. MUTYALA NAIDU,

First Appeal No. FA/155/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/07/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/12/2011 of District Vizianagaram)1. GOKUL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCES,REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, PIRIDI, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIJAYANAGARAM DIST............Appellant(s)Versus1. GORLE ...

Case Number: 155

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

M/s Frankfinn Institute of Air Hostess Tranining (A Unit of Rrankfinn Aviation Services (P)Ltd.). V/S Sukhmanjot singh Puina

Institute  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate ravi Kumar Mattoo& Ravinder Kumar

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 572 of 2012 1. Sukhmanjot singh Puina S/o Sh. Kamaljit Singh Punia, R/o Village Parjala, District Patiala, Punjab. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s...

Case Number: 572

|

Date of Filing: 30-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

एन.आय.टी(NIIT )Computer Institute V/S श्री.अजय शंकर कुंजीर

Institute  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/12/5181. श्री.अजय शंकर कुंजीर...........Complainant(s)Versus1. एन.आय.टी(NIIT )Computer Institute ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. S. M. KUMBHAR MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-01-1970

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.