Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE & ANR. V/S J. SONA SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. METTU GOVERDHAN REDDY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 566 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/07/2012 in Complaint No. 71/2011 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. J. SONA SINGHS/O. AKTHAR SINGH, R/O. H NO. 2-1-1074/GF, YELLAMMA BANDA, GURUNANAK COLONY, KU...
Case Number: 566
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2013
MANAGER CENTRAL INDIA INSTITUTE OF FARMECY V/S RAHUL NAGAR
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2023
NARMADA ADVANCE TRAUMA & CRITICAL CARE INSTITUTE V/S SMT.BATTO BAI
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate SAMBHAVNA RAJPUT
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2021
CAMBRIDGE Institute of Technology V/S Krishna Kumar Attri
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/13/9221. Krishna Kumar Attri Hosue No. 876 Venkateswhwara Nilaya 5ht Main C. T. Layout, arathalli Bangalore Bang...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
LIFE CARE INSTITUTE & MEDICAL TECH. V/S KAUSHIKKUMAR D BHATT
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate D M SONI
Respondant Advocate KETAN KAMDAR
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2020
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2016
The Principal, MCKV Institute of Engineering, V/S SRI. SUBHANKAR DANDA.
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892Complaint Case No. CC/12/1701. SRI. SUBHANKAR DANDA.S/O- Sunil Kumar Danda, village – Nutan Gram, P.O. Joypur Fakir D...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
BIMAL KUMAR GHOSH V/S ILS HOSPITAL (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS INSTITUTE OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY)
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARTHA SIL & ABHISHEK SARKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SUBRATA DASS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 114 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 16/02/2009 in Complaint No. 100/2001 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. ILS HOSPITAL (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS INSTITUTE OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY)Jeewansatya, DD-6, Salt La...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2013
AMBIKESH MISRA V/S BABU BANARASI DAS INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH CENTRE, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 834 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/10/2012 in Appeal No. 2533/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1504/20131. BABU BANARASI DAS INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH CEN...
Case Number: 834
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2013
President Institute Of Computer Suudies (ICS) V/S Shaikh Feroz Shaikh Mansur
Court Name: Beed
Appelant Advocate Adv Rajapurkar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/1761. Shaikh Feroz Shaikh MansurR/ Malipura BeedBeed Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. President Institute Of Computer Suudies (ICS)N.K.Plaza,Jalna Road BeedBeedMaharashtra2. Secreatry Instutute Of Compute Studies (ICS)N.K.Plaza Jalna Road Beed...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.