Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
C.G. Dental College & Research Institute V/S Ku. Manju Patre
Court Name: Rajnandgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Shatrughan Tode
Respondant Advocate Shri Thamos Anthoni
Complaint Case No. CC/13/491. Ku. Manju Patres/o Sonsingh Patre Add. Vill. Madadih, P.O. Kanki, RaipurRaipurC.G............Complainant(s)Versus1. C.G. Dental College & Research Instituteth. Principal/ Director c.g.dental college & Rea.Ins.Sundra, RajnandgonRajnandgaonC.G............
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE CHAIRMAN, INSTITUTE OF BANKING PERSONAL SELECTION V/S P.M.THOMAS
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/126/20131. P.M.THOMASPUTHENPURAYKKEL HOUSE PATTANIPPARA AVADUKKA.P.O-673528...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE CHAIRMAN, INSTITUTE OF BANKING PERSONAL SELECTIONIBPS HOUSE,90 FEET D.P.ROAD Near TAKUR POLYTECHNIC Off.WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY P.B.No.8587 KANDI...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NAV RATAN SKWADEN LEADER OFFICER SERVICES INSTITUTE 40 WING V/S RAMESH SINGH KUSHWAH
Court Name: Bhind
Appelant Advocate ANIL MISHRA
Respondant Advocate DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
Mahasina Mohammad Nisar Shaikh V/S Principal, Vidya Vikas Pratishthan Institute of Engineering & Technology, Solapur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Santosh A. Patil
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/13/241. Principal, Vidya Vikas Pratishthan Institute of Engineering & Technology, SolapurSoregaon-Dongaon road, Soregaon, Solapur, Pin 413008SolapurMaharashtra ......
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Symbiosis Institute Of Business V/S Mr.Ankit Jaganath
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2540
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2022
Dina Institute Hotel & Buisness Management V/S Niteshkumar S.Sing
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate S.A.RAut
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/5341. Niteshkumar S.SingB7/14,Aturnagar Undri PunePuneMaha............Complainant(s)Versus1. Dina Institute Hotel & Buisness ManagementUndri, PunePuneMaha.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. S. M. KUMBHAR MEMBER ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE & ANR. V/S J. SONA SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. METTU GOVERDHAN REDDY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 402 OF 2013 IN FA/566/20121. J. SONA SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. L.V. PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE...
Case Number: 402
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2013
Dr.Madhu, Consultant incharge, Malalabar Institute of medical Science, V/S Jacob,S/o Mathai,
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/139/20131. Jacob,S/o Mathai, Vettuvayalil house, Mandalam Po, Naduvil amsom, Thaliparamba Taluk kannurkerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr.Madhu, Consultant incharge, Malalabar Institute of medical Science...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M.M.Lari, Columbus Maritime Training Institute V/S Manojkumar
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/3101. ManojkumarS/o.Late.Kun hikannan, Mottanchira House, Poochakkad, Po.KeekanKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M.M.Lari, Columbus Maritime Training InstituteItrat Nagar, Chanepada, Po.Khardi west. Shahapur.Dt Thane.412304Shahapur.Maharash...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SAE INSTITUTE MUMBAI V/S ANKEET GURUDUTT PAI
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.