company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

NCDRC

VIKAS ARYA V/S SANTOKBA DURLABHJI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE & ANR.

Hospital   Medical   Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK GUPTA & PURUSHOTTAM S.T.

Respondant Advocate MR. UMESH NAGPAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 537 OF 2013 IN FA/320/20111. SANTOKBA DURLABHJI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. VIKAS ARYA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR....

Case Number: 537

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2013

Chandigarh

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education V/S Gulshan Bala

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal Adv. for the complainant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Garg, Adv. for Ops.no.1 & 3 to 13. OP No. 2 deleted.

Complaint Case No. CC/1/20131. Gulshan BalaChd............Complainant(s)Versus1. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research(P.G.I.M.E.R., Chandigarh) through its Director2. Dr. Jayanta Samanta, Junior Resident,(Posted in Emergency Medical OPD on 03.03.2011) in post...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 01-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

BHARTIYA INSTITUTE PLAN ENGINEERING V/S SANJAY SINGH

Institute  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 627

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2016

NCDRC

GOKUL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCES, V/S GORLE MURALI KRISHNA

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR.G.MUTYALA NAIDU

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2738 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/04/2013 in Appeal No. 155/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. GORLE MURALI KRISHNAS/O SATYANARAYANA, R/O AT ANTHAKAPALLI VILLAGE.SABBAVARAM MANDAL,VIS...

Case Number: 2738

|

Date of Filing: 23-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2013

Maharashtra

Director, S.B. Jain Institute of Technology Management and Reaserch V/S Shri Shyamsunder Zamandas Wanjani

Institute  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. Dadu Sachdev

Respondant Advocate Adv.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/2741. Shri Shyamsunder Zamandas Wanjani98, Kukraja Nagar, JaripatakaNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Director,...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2017

Madhya Pradesh

Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Media and Technology V/S Dayashanker Mishra

Institute  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2016

Maharashtra

bramhadeodadamane institute of tekanalogi V/S surat balasaheb kote

Institute  

Court Name: Solapur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/12/1401. surat balasaheb koteunited residancy raily lines solapursolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. bramhadeodadamane institute of tekanalogibelati solapursolapurMaharashtra............Opp....

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

M/s. IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co., Ltd, V/S M/s. Shimoga Institute of Medical Science

Medical   Institute   General Insurance  

Court Name: Shimoga

Appelant Advocate Shri. K.Basappa Gouda

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-10-2020

Madhya Pradesh

Akash Institute V/S Ms Ishita Pandey

Institute  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.