Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.S.Nanda
Respondant Advocate Mr. J. Prabhakar ? R2
RP No. 23 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/12/2012 in Case No. CC/78/2012 of District ADILABAD)1. The Director, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Panjagutta, Hyderabad............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. Raghamshetti Naresh, S/o.Shankar, Aged 27 Years, Occ; Student, R/o. ...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S V. GOURI SANKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. SRINIVASA RAO PACHWA
First Appeal No. FA/277/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/12/2011 in Case No. CC/106/2005 of District Rangareddi)1. 1. JELLA RAMESH, S/O SATHAIAH, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O 8-128, NEAR RLY STATION, PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR DIST.2. 2. BABY JELLA SATVIKA, D/O JELLA RAMESH, AGED 8 YEARS, BEING ...
Case Number: 277
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 863
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-11-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. RAJAPPA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3535 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 27/05/2008 in Appeal No. 109/2005 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLINGThrough its Director, A-24/25 Institutional Area, Sector 62No...
Case Number: 3535
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal , Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv. for the respondent
First Appeal No. FA/342/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Anshul SainiUT...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Regional Institute of Cooperative Management, Chandigarh(An Institution of national Council for Coopertive Training New Delhi) Sector-32-C, Chandi...
Case Number: 342
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal , Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv. for the respondent
First Appeal No. FA/343/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Anamika SinghMohali...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Regional Institute of Cooperaative Management, Chandigarh(An Institution of National Council for Cooperative Training, New Delhi) Sector-32/C...
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal , Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv. for the respondent
First Appeal No. FA/344/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Ms. Nisha D/o Sh. Anant Ram SainiHP...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Regional Institute of Cooperative Management, Chandigarh(An Institution of National For Cooperative Traning New Delhi) Sector...
Case Number: 344
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal , Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv. for the respondent
First Appeal No. FA/346/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Pallawi SinghUP...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Regional Institute of Cooperative Management, Chandigarh(An Institution of National Council for Cooperative Training, New Delhi) Sector-32/C, Cha...
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal , Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv. for the respondent
First Appeal No. FA/347/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Shintanshu RanjanBihar...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Regional Institute of Coopertaive Management, Cahndigarh(An Institution of National Council for Cooperative Training New Delhi) Sector-32/...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.