company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

Madhya Pradesh

KOTHARI INSTITUTE EXCELENCE V/S PRIYA SHARMA

Institute  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 702

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 25-10-2016

NCDRC

VIPIN MEHRA V/S ESCORT HEART INSTITUTE RESEARCH CENTRE

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJEEV SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. SAMEER NANDWANI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 723 OF 2013 IN FA/91/20071. ESCORT HEART INSTITUTE RESEARCH CENTRE...........Appellants(s)Versus1. VIPIN MEHRA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON'B...

Case Number: 723

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2013

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Director/Pricipal,M.G.M. Institute Of Bio-Sciences &Technology, V/S Narendra Yeshwant Phadnis

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Adv.Shri.Ruturaj Patil

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.FA No: 519 Of 2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/08/2011 in Case No. 418/2010 of District None)1. Narendra Yeshwant PhadnisR/O.202,Jagat Towers,Tilak Nagar,Amravati Road,Nagpur-440 010Nagpu...

Case Number: 519

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Director/Pricipal,M.G.M. Institute Of Bio-Sciences &Technology, V/S Narendra Yeshwant Phadnis

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.S.Kinhekar

Respondant Advocate

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.FA No: 519 Of 2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/08/2011 in Case No. 418/2010 of District None)1. Narendra Yeshwant PhadnisR/O.202,Jagat Towers,Tilak Nagar,Amravati Road,Nagpur-440 010Nagpu...

Case Number: 319

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE & RESEARCH CENTRE V/S SURINDER SINGH

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.N. CHAWLA

Respondant Advocate M/S. LEX PRO

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 464 OF 20021. SURINDER SINGH S/O. S. GURBAX SINGH R/O. 20 VIDYA NAGAR GOVIND PURI ROAD YAMUNA NAGAR HARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE & RESEARCH CENTREOKHLA ROAD NEW DELHI 11...

Case Number: 464

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2002

|

Date of Upload: 11-11-2013

Madhya Pradesh

JEEWAN MOTORS V/S INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT

Institute  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate ADV

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 05-10-2021

Madhya Pradesh

DIRECTOR,TARUN KUMAR,OM SAI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT V/S KAMLAKANT MAHAKUL

Institute  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-10-2021

NCDRC

KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KIMS) & 2 ORS. V/S K. SANJEEV KUMAR @ KAMMA SANJEEVA RAO

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. B. RAMANA MURTHY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR TANDALE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 191 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 30/01/2013 in Complaint No. 44/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. K. SANJEEV KUMAR @ KAMMA SANJEEVA RAOS/O. K.PAPA RAO, ALIAS KAMMA PAPA RAO AND DHANLAXMI, R/...

Case Number: 191

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2013

NCDRC

SHWETA V/S INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2222 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/03/2011 in Appeal No. 1922/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY700 Sector-13P through it directorHissar Haryana2. Sh...

Case Number: 2222

|

Date of Filing: 29-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2013

Madhya Pradesh

Director Institute of Aironutics & Engineering Shahpur Road, Bhopal V/S Jitendra Soni

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.