company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

Chandigarh

Rohit Goyal V/S The Swami Vivekanand Institute of Engineering

Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Vikas Goyal Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Miscellaneous Application No. MA/3/20141. The Swami Vivekanand Institute of EngineeringChd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERAs per the Office report, no stay order or any other order has been received from the Hon'ble Nat...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Gajanan Vitthalrao Kumbalkar V/S Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Institute of Homeopatic medical science

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Saboo

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/10/605(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. cc/173/2001 of District None)1. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Memoria...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

CHETANA'S INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, V/S Shri ASHUTOSH BANSAL,

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 444 OF 20131. Shri ASHUTOSH BANSAL,2362, Hudson Line, Mall Road,DELHI - 110009............Complainant(s)Versus1. CHETANA'S INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH,Survey No. 341, Govt. Colony, Bandra (E),MUMBAI...

Case Number: 444

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2014

NCDRC

SHRIKANT SINGH V/S MAHATMA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & ANR.

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SIDDHESH KOTWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. MANNU MOHAN BANSAL & MR. JATIN RAJPUT

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3268 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/03/2013 in Appeal No. 661/2000 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/5769/2013,IA/5770/20131. MAHATMA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & ANR.SEWAGRAM, ...

Case Number: 3268

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 08-01-2014

NCDRC

INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE V/S MOHD. RAFAT KHAN

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. V.K. SAXENA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/06/2013 in Appeal No. 1410/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MOHD. RAFAT KHANS/O ABDUL WAHAB KHAN, R/O WARD NO-8, LOHARI GALI,BALAGHAT, DISTRICT : B...

Case Number: 3654

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 02-01-2014

NCDRC

PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY V/S SHERRY SOFAT

Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. FERRY SOFAT & MR. ROHAN SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4670 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 25/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1067/2013 of the State Commission Punjab)1. SHERRY SOFATS/O ASHOK KUMAR, SOFAT , R/O HOUSE NO-171,SECTOR-3, BLOCK,C, MIAN BAZAR, MANDI GOBI...

Case Number: 4670

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2014

Madhya Pradesh

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2020

Karnataka

The Principal,St. Aloysius Institute of Computer Science V/S Ajay Kumar.R

Institute   Computer  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate K.S.N. Rajesh

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/88/2013( Date of Filing : 19 Mar 2013 )1. Ajay Kumar.RS o Rayappa, Aged about 26 years, Rat Mithrapatna Mukka Post, Sasihithlu Road, Surathkal, Mangalore, D.K. 575 021.............

Case Number: 88

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-12-2018

Madhya Pradesh

MORAL INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES V/S RAJESH BABU

Institute  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 802

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2016

Madhya Pradesh

MORAL INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES V/S SAYYAD FARUK ALI

Institute  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 805

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.